Investing in General Training: The Dual Training Program
Keywords:
general training, human capital, apprenticeship, asymmetric information, ChileAbstract
In the Human Capital Theory developed by Becker (1964) firms have no incentives to provide general training unless workers are willing to finance it. In this paper, we argued that under certain conditions (either asymmetric information or strategic complementarity between general and specific training) firms are willing to pay for general training. Using data from the Chilean apprenticeship program, which consists on a joint educational program between schools and productive firms under which students spend a fraction of their time in the firms and a fraction on formal education, we cannot reject the hypothesis that firms pay for general training.Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555531
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. (1999a). The structure of wages and investment in general training. Journal of Political Economy, 107(3), 539–572. https://doi.org/10.1086/250071
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. (1999b). Certification of training outcomes. Massachusetts Inst. Tech, Dept. Econ.
Autor, D. H. (2001). Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1409–1448. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265615
Balmaceda, F. (2001). Firm-Sponsored general training in a frictionless labor market. Ilades-Georgetown. Working Paper I-139.
Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. Columbia University Press.
Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., & Wolinsky, A. (1986). The nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. The RAND Journal of Economics, 17(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555382
Bishop, J. (1994). The impact of previous training on productivity and wages. En: Lisa Lynch (ed.). Training and the Private Sector, The University of Chicago Press.
Bishop, J., & Kang, S. (1996). Do Some employers share the cost and benefits of general training. Working Paper Nº 96, Cornell University.
Bravo, D., Peirano, C., Sevilla, P., & Weintraub, M. (2001). Formación dual. un Desafío para Chile. Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.
Chang, C., & Wang, Y. (1996). Human capital investment under asymmetric information: The pigovian conjecture revisited. Journal of Labor Economics, 14(3), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1086/209820
Katz, E., & Ziderman, A. (1990). Investment in general training: The role of information and labour mobility. The Economic Journal, 100(403), 1147–1158. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233964
Loewenstein, M. A., & Spletzer, J. R. (1997). Delayed formal on-the-job training. ILR Review, 51(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399705100106
Loewenstein, M. A., & Spletzer, J. R. (1998). Dividing the costs and returns to general training. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/209885
Oulton, N., & Steedman, H. (1994). The British system of youth training. A comparison with Germany. En: Lisa Lynch (ed.). Training and the Private Sector, The University of Chicago Press.
Prendergast, C. (1992). The role of promotion in inducing specific human capital acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118343
Soskice, D. (1994). Reconciling markets and institution, the German apprenticeship system. En: Lisa Lynch (ed.). Training and the Private Sector, The University of Chicago Press.
Waldman, M. (1990). Up-or-Out contracts: A signaling perspective. Journal of Labor Economics, 8(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/298221
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Felipe Balmaceda, Maria Paola Sevilla Buitron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 153
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 397
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 69 views, 104 downloads.
2.59 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics