US Monetary Policy Uncertainty Impact on Latin American Currency Market Volatility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702025000100067Keywords:
Monetary Policy Uncertainty, Latin American Countries, Exchange Rate Volatility, GARCH Model, MS-VAR ApproachAbstract
This paper analyzes whether the US Monetary Policy Uncertainty (MPU) impacts the exchange rate volatility of the Integrated Latin American Market (MILA) countries1, over the period 2004-2022. For this purpose, we employ univariate GARCH models and Vector Autoregressive Markov Switching Models (MS-VAR). Originality lies in the analysis of emerging countries using a dynamic model to observe how currencies volatility is affected through US Monetary Policy changes. This research also reveals how currency volatility evolves and which market is more vulnerable to foreign monetary shocks. Results evidence long memory and persistence in currencies volatility. In particular, the Colombian peso (COP), the Chilean peso (CLP) and the Peruvian sol (PEN) appear to have been affected in their behavior since the unconventional monetary policy measures implemented in 2008 during the global financial crisis. In contrast, the Mexican Peso (MXN) has been affected since the COVID-19 monetary policy changes. In terms of the MS-VAR results, all volatility currencies influence its own previous values. US MPU seems to impact the exchange rates volatility during the high volatility regime.
Downloads
References
Aftab, M., & Mehmood, A. (2023). Does central bank transparency deter the exchange rate volatility? New evidence from Asian emerging markets. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 12(2), 133–163.
Aftab, M., Naeem, M., Tahir, M., & Ismail, I. (2023). Does uncertainty promote exchange rate volatility? Global evidence. Studies in Economics and Finance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-12-2022-0579
Ahmed, S., Akinci, O., & Queralto, A. (2021). U.S. monetary policy spillovers to emerging markets: Both shocks and vulnerabilities matter (International Finance Discussion Paper N.º 1321). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2021.1321
Albrecht, P., Kapounek, S., & Kučerová, Z. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets' co-movements. International Journal of Finance & Economics.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.
Borrallo, F., H., I., & Vallés, J. (2016). The effects of US unconventional monetary policies in Latin America (Working Paper N.º 1606). Banco de España.
Chen, L., Du, Z., & Hu, Z. (2020). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on exchange rate volatility of China. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.014
Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2006). What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.05.010
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (1995). Some empirical evidence on the effects of shocks to monetary policy on exchange rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 975–1009. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946646
Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
Feng, G. F., Yang, H. C., Gong, Q., & Chang, C. P. (2021). What is the exchange rate volatility response to COVID-19 and government interventions? Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 705–719.
Francq, C., & Zakoïan, J. M. (2010). Inconsistency of the MLE and inference based on weighted LS for LARCH models. Journal of Econometrics, 159(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.05.003
Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x
Huang, W. Q., & Liu, P. (2022). Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty on stock returns under different market conditions: Evidence from G7 stock markets. Applied Economics Letters, 29(9), 780–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1885606
Husted, L., Rogers, J. H., & Sun, B. (2017). Monetary policy uncertainty (International Finance Discussion Paper N.º 1215). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2017.1215
Kurov, A., & Stan, R. (2018). Monetary policy uncertainty and the market reaction to macroeconomic news. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.005
Mueller, P., Tahbaz-Salehi, A., & Vedolin, A. (2017). Exchange rates and monetary policy uncertainty. Journal of Finance, 72(3), 1213–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12499
Ojeda-Joya, J., & Romero, J. V. (2023). Global uncertainty shocks and exchange-rate expectations in Latin America. Economic Modelling, 120(C), 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106185
Park, D., Qureshi, I., Tian, S., & Villaruel, M. L. (2020). Impact of US monetary policy uncertainty on Asian exchange rates. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09307-3
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (1989). Does monetary policy matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 4, 121–170. https://doi.org/10.1086/654103
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2004). A new measure of monetary shocks: Derivation and implications. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1055–1084. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002651
Romer, C., & Romer, D. H. (2023). Does monetary policy matter? The narrative approach after 35 years (Working Paper N.º 31170). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w31170
Rubbaniy, G., Khalid, A. A., Tessema, A., & Baqrain, A. (2022). Do stock market fear and economic policy uncertainty co-move with COVID-19 fear? Evidence from the US and UK. Studies in Economics and Finance. Advance online publication.
Tunc, A., Kocoglu, M., & Aslan, A. (2022). Time-varying characteristics of the simultaneous interactions between economic uncertainty, international oil prices and GDP: A novel approach for Germany. Resources Policy, 77, 102658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102658
Yuan, D., Li, S., Li, R., & Zhang, F. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, oil and stock markets in BRIC: Evidence from quantiles analysis. Energy Economics, 110, 105972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105972
Zhang, W., Huang, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). The symmetric and asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty and oil prices on carbon emissions in the USA and China: Evidence from the ARDL and non-linear ARDL approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(18), 26465–26482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17839-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miriam Sosa, Alejandra Cabello-Rosales, Edgar Ortiz Calisto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 394
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 333
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 2% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 2%.
Last 2 years: 394 views, 333 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 1 · Crossref 1
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. Peru 14% · Poland 14% · United States 14%
0.85 downloads per view (journal average 1.66).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
