Fiscal Dominance in the Brazilian Economy? Econometric Analysis by the Method of Simulated Moments

Eduardo Campos; Rubens Cysne

doi:10.4067/S0718-88702025000200027

Authors

Eduardo Campos EPGE Escola Brasileira de Economia e Finanças (FGV EPGE)
Rubens Cysne EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance (FGV EPGE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702025000200027

Keywords:

Fiscal Dominance, Method of Simulated Moments (MSM), Inflation, Monetary Policy

Abstract

This work investigates the possibility of fiscal dominance in Brazil and analyses the effectiveness of controlling inflation by increasing the basic interest rate. Our analysis considers an empirical model estimated by the Method of Simulated Moments (MSM), which allows us to make stochastic projections for the relevant economic variables and identify their impacts on the debt’s solvency. Estimating macro equations using the method of moments avoids the problem of possible correlation between residuals and explanatory variables. We consider different fiscal scenarios and obtain conditional probabilities of fiscal dominance. Our main conclusion is that –no matter the scenario and in spite of a greater fiscal deterioration– the probability of the Brazilian economy finding itself in a state of fiscal dominance in the post-pandemic years is negligible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araújo, J. M. de, & Besarria, C. da N. (2014). Relações de dominância entre as políticas fiscal e monetária: Uma análise para economia brasileira no período de 2003 a 2009 [Dominance relations between fiscal and monetary policies: An analysis of the Brazilian economy from 2003 to 2009]. Revista de Economia, 40(1), 55–70.

Blanchard, O. J. (2004). Fiscal dominance and inflation targeting: Lessons from Brazil [Working Paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Campos, E. L., & Cysne, R. P. (2019a). A time-varying fiscal reaction function for Brazil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 49(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614911ecr

Campos, E. L., & Cysne, R. P. (2019b). An alert on the recent fall of the fiscal reaction in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 39(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572019-2976

Canova, F. (2007). Methods for applied macroeconomic research. Princeton University Press.

Carneiro, D. D., & Wu, T. Y. (2005). Dominância fiscal e desgaste do instrumento único de política monetária no Brasil [Fiscal dominance and erosion of the single monetary policy instrument in Brazil]. Instituto de Estudos de Política Econômica.

Chinn, M. D. (2006). The (partial) rehabilitation of interest rate parity in the floating rate era: Longer horizons, alternative expectations, and emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.10.003

Da Silva, R., & De Gamboa, U. R. (2011). Regime fiscal e sustentabilidade da dívida pública brasileira 1986 a 2006 [Fiscal regime and sustainability of Brazilian public debt, 1986 to 2006]. Revista Gestão & Políticas Públicas, 1(1), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.11606/rgpp.v1i1.97833

Favero, C., & Giavazzi, F. (2004). Inflation targeting and debt: Lessons from Brazil [Discussion Paper]. C.E.P.R.

Flora, M. S., & Santolin, R. (2023). Dominância fiscal e dominância monetária para o Brasil: Uma análise empírica a partir de projeções locais no período de 1999 a 2022 [Fiscal dominance and monetary dominance for Brazil: An empirical analysis using local projections from 1999 to 2022]. Nova Economia, 33(2), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/7534

Gadelha, S. R. B., & Divino, J. Â. (2008). Dominância fiscal ou dominância monetária no Brasil? Uma análise de causalidade [Fiscal dominance or monetary dominance in Brazil? A causality analysis]. Economia Aplicada, 12(4), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-80502008000400006

Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00023-9

Gonçalves, C. E. (2017). Is fiscal dominance for real? Evidence from Brazil's high frequency data. International Monetary Fund.

Hakkio, C. S., & Rush, M. (1991). Is the budget deficit "too large"? Economic Inquiry, 29(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb00837.x

Higo, M., et al. (1999). What determines the relation between the output gap and inflation? An international comparison of inflation expectations and staggered wage adjustment. Monetary and Economic Studies, 17(3), 129–155.

International Monetary Fund. (2018). Fiscal monitor: Capitalizing on good times (World Economic and Financial Surveys). International Monetary Fund.

Issler, J. V., & Lima, L. R. (2000). Public debt sustainability and endogenous seigniorage in Brazil: Time-series evidence from 1947-1992. Journal of Development Economics, 62(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00078-X

Loyo, E. (1999). Tight money paradox on the loose: A fiscalist hyperinflation [Manuscript]. Harvard University.

Marques Jr., K. (2010). Há dominância fiscal na economia brasileira? Uma análise empírica para o período do Governo Lula [Is there fiscal dominance in the Brazilian economy? An empirical analysis for the Lula government period]. Indicadores Econômicos FEE, 38(1), 63–80.

McFadden, D. (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica, 5, 995–1026. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913621

Moura, M. L., & De Carvalho, A. (2010). What can Taylor rules say about monetary policy in Latin America? Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(1), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.03.002

Pakes, A., & Pollard, D. (1989). Simulation and the asymptotics of optimization estimators. Econometrica, 5, 1027–1057. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913622

Palma, A., & Althaus, F. (2015). Choques estruturais e teoria fiscal do nível de preços no Brasil: Uma análise empírica para o período pós-metas de inflação [Structural shocks and the fiscal theory of the price level in Brazil: An empirical analysis for the post-inflation-targeting period]. Ensaios FEE, 36(1), 33–58.

Pastore, A. C. (1997). Passividade monetária e inércia [Monetary passivity and inertia]. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 51(1), 3–52.

Resende, A. L. (2017). Juros, moeda e ortodoxia: Teorias monetárias e controvérsias políticas [Interest, money and orthodoxy: Monetary theories and political controversies]. Portfolio-Penguin.

Sanchez-Fung, J. R. (2011). Estimating monetary policy reaction functions for emerging market economies: The case of Brazil. Economic Modelling, 28(4), 1730–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.03.007

Sargent, T. J., & Wallace, N. (1981). Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21034/qr.531

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L

Vartanian, P. R., & Caseli, A. M. G. (2023). Dominância fiscal na economia brasileira revisitada: Uma análise econométrica no período 2016-2022 [Fiscal dominance in the Brazilian economy revisited: An econometric analysis for the period 2016–2022]. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 9(1), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.55905/ijsmtv9n1-026

Woodford, M., & Walsh, C. E. (2005). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 9(3), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.976_1.x