Velocity and Money Demand in an Economy with Cash and Credit Goods

Authors

Keywords:

velocity of money, money demand, cash and credit goods, monetary policy, cointegration, vector autoregression (VAR)

Abstract

The traditional cash in advance macroeconomic models are characterized by a constant velocity of money. Based on the Lucas and Stokey (1987) model, this paper studies the behavior of velocity and money demand for the U.S., simulating an economy which includes stochastic monetary growth (monetary policy), and income taxes (fiscal policy). The results of the simulations are compared with the actual data using several methods. First, the classical metric of standard errors and correlations are evaluated using block-Wald testing procedures. Next, we implement a well specified VAR estimation to study the impulse response functions of interest rates, velocity and the deficit, among other variables. The impulse responses of the model with both policies (with and without fiscal sector) are compared with the corresponding impulse responses for the data. As a third distance evaluation method, based on Braun (1994), the money demand was studied under the Canonical Cointegrating Regression approach. As a conclusion, and based on the three metrics, the model is not rejected in its ability to reproduce an important proportion of the observed volatility in the U.S.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1997-04-30

How to Cite

Johnson, C. (1997). Velocity and Money Demand in an Economy with Cash and Credit Goods. Economic Analysis Review, 12(1), 153–200. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/139

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
182
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
195

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 19% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 19%.

Last 2 years: 100 views, 118 downloads.

1.07 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics