Basic Baskets in Health Care
Keywords:
Basic health baskets, Prioritization, Obligatory insurance, Health benefits, Public goods, Health policyAbstract
The present article has the following objectives: firstly, to present the major benefits of the basic baskets in order to understand prioritization, in the area of an obligatory insurance, and affirm the difficulty in implementing these types of initiatives. Secondly, to show that the approval and implementation of a basic basket fundamentally depends on the active participation of the affected, and thus, the capacity of the government to transform them into supporters of the project. Thirdly, point out that the principles on which the prioritization mechanism is based and the objectives proposed for the basket both make up significant factors in achieving this support.Downloads
References
Aedo, C. (1994). Plan referencial de salud, informe primera etapa [Estudio para la Superintendencia de ISAPRE de Chile y la Organización Panamericana de la Salud].
Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: Managing in a dynamic environment. Quorum Books.
Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate strategy. McGraw-Hill.
Bamberger, M. (1991). The politics of evaluation in developing countries. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(91)90015-9
Banco Mundial. (1993). World development report 1993: Investing in health.
Bobadilla, J. L., Cowley, P., Musgrove, P., & Saxenian, H. (1994). Design, content and financing of an essential national package of health services. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 72(4).
Brown, L. (1991). The national politics of Oregon's rationing plan. Health Affairs, Summer.
Bryk, A. S. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder-based evaluation. New directions in program based evaluation. Jossey-Bass.
Bryson, J. (1990). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.
Callahan, D. (1991). Commentary. Ethics and priority setting in Oregon. Health Affairs, Summer.
Collins, D. (1989). Organizational harm, legal condemnation and stakeholder retaliation: A typology, research agenda and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00382011
Etzioni, A. (1991). Commentary. Health care rationing: A critical evaluation. Health Affairs, Summer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Cristián Aedo I., Arístides Torche L.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 120
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 391
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 55 views, 211 downloads.
3.26 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics