The Political Economy of Public Pensions: Pension Funding, Governance, and Fiscal Stress
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe and evaluate how public sector defined benefit pension plans are managed, and to assess possible implications of different pension management styles for promised pension benefits. The authors explore Ihe actuarial and economic assumptions employed by public pension managers when they set funding targets, using a new survey of state and local pension plans in the United States. The analysis shows that key assumptions under the control of public pension plan lrustees are sensitive to factors in the pension environment. An implication of the paper is that public pension funding patterns may become more sensitive to strategic seiection of interest role and other key assumptions as public sector budgets are subjected to fiscal pressures, and when they are managed by participant-run boards.
How to Cite
Hsin, P.-L., & Mitchell, O. (1). The Political Economy of Public Pensions: Pension Funding, Governance, and Fiscal Stress. Economic Analysis Review, 9(1), 151-168. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/189
Issue
Section
Articles
Upon submission of an article, authors are asked to indicate their agreement to abide by an open-access license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors of the work. The license ensures that your article will be as widely available as possible and that your article can be included in any scientific archive. Please read about the Creative Commons Attribution License before submitting your paper.
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License