Grandma's Dress, or What's New for Optimal Growth

Authors

Keywords:

optimal growth, time preference, welfare function, intertemporal preferences, poverty trap, neoclassical technology

Abstract

The recent revival of interest in optimal growth theory justifies the analysis of more flexible descriptions of preferences over time and their implications for optimal growth, in constrat with some of the newer investigations which attribute differing growth paths to tecnological factors. For the case of discrete time, using welfare functions for which the rate of time preference is variable, Beals and Koopmans showed in 1969 that the long run optimal capital path may depend on initial wealth, so that not all of the conclusions of optimal growth theory with a constant rate of time preference hold. Equivalent results for the case of continuous time have been reached by the present author. The analysis by the author of a particular case in which the resulting welfare function can be explicitly represented as an integral, illustrates the qualitative behavior of optimal growth paths. A more thorough analysis shows that a suitable limiting process allows one to define a utility function for continuous time with a variable rate of time preference which cannot be represented in closed form. The present investigation applies such preferences to optimal growth, with results similar to those obtained for the dscrete time case. In particular —when the rate of time preference is allowed to vary— a country may decide not to undertake the effort of economic development when its initial capital endowment is below some critical level. It is impossible to obtain such a result with a constant rate of time preference in the case of a simple neoclassical technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.

Beals, R., & Koopmans, T. C. (1969). Maximizing stationary utility in a constant technology. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17(5), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1137/0117089

Blanchard, O., & Fischer, S. (1991). Lectures on macroeconomics. MIT Press.

Burness, H. S. (1973). Impatience and the preference for advancement in the timing of satisfactions. Journal of Economic Theory, 6(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(73)90090-2

Burness, H. S. (1976). On the role of separability assumptions in determining impatience implications. Econometrica, 44(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911381

Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies, 32(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295827

Debreu, G. (1954). Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, & R. L. Davis (Eds.), Decision processes (cap. 11, pp. 159–165). Wiley.

Diamond, P. A. (1965). The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica, 33(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911893

Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. Macmillan.

Iwai, K. (1972). Optimal economic growth and stationary ordinal utility: A Fisherian approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90122-6

Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28(2), 287–309.

Koopmans, T. C. (1972). Representation of preference orderings over time. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization: A volume in honor of Jacob Marschak. North-Holland.

Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P. A., & Williamson, R. E. (1964). Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica, 32(1-2), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913736

Lee, E. B., & Markus, L. (1967). Foundations of optimal control theory. John Wiley & Sons.

Mantel, R. R. (1966). Sobre la tasa de preferencia temporal [Mimeo]. Instituto Torcuato Di Tella.

Mantel, R. R. (1967a). Tentative list of postulates for a utility function for an infinite future with continuous time (CF-70525 N.º 1). Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics.

Mantel, R. R. (1967b). Criterios de desarrollo económico óptimo (Staff Paper N.º 38). Instituto Torcuato Di Tella.

Mantel, R. R. (1968). Criteria for optimal economic development. Económica (La Plata), 3.

Mantel, R. R. (1970). On the utility of infinite programs when time is continuous [Ponencia]. Second World Congress of the Econometric Society, Cambridge.

Mantel, R. R. (1976). Maximization of utility over time with a variable rate of time-preference (CF-70525 N.º 2). Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics.

Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098

Rebelo, S. (1991). Long run policy analysis and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1086/261764

Uzawa, H. (1968). Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. In J. N. Wolfe (Ed.), Value, capital, and growth: Papers in honour of Sir John Hicks (cap. 21, pp. 485–504). Edinburgh University Press.

Downloads

Published

1993-04-30

How to Cite

Mantel, R. (1993). Grandma’s Dress, or What’s New for Optimal Growth. Economic Analysis Review, 8(1), 61–81. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/203

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
108
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
144

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 52 views, 91 downloads.

1.33 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics