Credit Rationing and the Permanent Income Hypothesis
Keywords:
credit rationing, permanent income hypothesis, aggregate consumption, marginal propensity to consume, intertemporal substitution, credit constraintsAbstract
We model endogenous credit rationing and its effects on aggregate consumption behavior. We explain two important empirical paradoxes of the consumption literature. First, it is possible that some configurations of income/consumption streams be such that an outside observer could estimate a marginal propensity to consume greater than one. Second, if one tried to estimate an intertemporal substitution model disregarding credit constraints, it might result in a nonconcave utility function, even when consumers' utility functions are concave.Downloads
References
Bernanke, B. (1983). Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the Great Depression. American Economic Review, 73(3), 257–276.
Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1987). Financial fragility and economic performance (Working Paper). University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Campbell, J. (1987). Does saving anticipate declining labor income? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis. Econometrica, 55(6), 1249–1274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913556
Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (1986). The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory. Review of Economic Studies, 53(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297588
Flavin, M. (1981). The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 974–1009.
Hall, R. (1987). The role of consumption in economic fluctuations. In R. J. Gordon (Ed.), The American business cycle. University of Chicago Press.
Hall, R., & Mishkin, F. (1982). The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: Estimates from panel data on households. Econometrica, 50(2), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912638
Hayashi, F. (1982). The permanent income hypothesis: Estimation and testing by instrumental variables. Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1086/261100
Hayashi, F. (1985). The permanent income hypothesis and consumption durability: Analysis based on Japanese panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(4), 1083–1113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885676
Jacklin, C. (1985). Credit terminations and correlated shocks [Manuscrito no publicado]. Stanford University.
Jaffee, D., & Russell, T. (1976). Imperfect information and credit rationing. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885327
Mankiw, N. G. (1987). The allocation of credit and financial collapse. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885692
Mankiw, N. G., Rotemberg, J., & Summers, L. (1985). Intertemporal substitution in macroeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(1), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885743
Mariger, R. (1987). A life-cycle consumption model with liquidity constraints: Theory and empirical results. Econometrica, 55(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913599
Sargent, T. J. (1978). Rational expectations, econometric exogeneity and consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 86(4), 673–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/260704
Scheinkman, J., & Weiss, L. (1986). Borrowing constraints and aggregate economic activity. Econometrica, 54(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914155
Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1993 Vicente Madrigal, Tommy Tan, Daniel Vicent, Sergio Ribeiro da Costa Werlang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 144
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 157
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 48 views, 92 downloads.
1.09 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics