The Discount Rate in Long-Term Investment Projects
Keywords:
discount rate, gamma discounting, long-term projects, project evaluation, environmental economicsAbstract
This paper estimates the rate of discount to be used in Chile when evaluating long run projects with environmental consequences. The methodology is known as Gamma Discounting and was presented first by Martin Weitzman in the American Economic Review in March 2001.Downloads
References
Azqueta, D. (1994). Valoración económica de la calidad ambiental. McGraw Hill.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Cropper, M. L., & Laibson, D. (1999). The implications of hyperbolic discounting for project evaluation. en Paul R. Portney y John P. Weyant (eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 163–72.
Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human well being and the natural environment. Oxford University Press.
Edwards, G. (2002). The effect of choosing between a constant or a declining discount rate on optimal investment timing. Documento de Trabajo Nº 227. Instituto de Economía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1999). Discounting and public policies that affect the distant future. en P. R. Portney y J. P. Weyant (eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Resources for the Future.
Turner, R. K., Pearce, D., & Bateman, I. (1993). Environmental economics: An elementary introduction. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Turnovsky, S. (2000). Methods of macroeconomic dynamics. MIT Press, segunda edición.
Weitzman, M. L. (2001). Gamma discounting. American Economic Review, 91(1), 260–71.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Gonzalo Edwards

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 168
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 1,061
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 64 views, 319 downloads.
6.32 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics