Economic Theory and Environmental Degradation: A Survey of Some Problems

Authors

  • Karl-Goran Maler Stockholm School of Economics and The World Bank image/svg+xml

Keywords:

environmental degradation, externalities, market failure, policy failure, environmental valuation, game theory

Abstract

Both market and policy failures can lead to environmental degradation. Considerable progress has been made in the area of project evaluation and the valuation of environmental effects. On the other hand the analytical tools to study the effects of policy failures —the impact of taxes, prices, exchange rate and incentives— are more limited. The correct handling of uncertainty also remains a major issue. The analysis of international environmental problems, such as acid rain or CO2 buildup, may benefit from the application of game theory approaches and the use of revelation mechanisms designed for public goods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrow, K. J., & Fisher, A. C. (1974). Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883074

Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption and externalities. American Economic Review, 59(3), 282–297.

Bojo, J., & Hultcrantz, L. (1985). Kostnads nytto analys av fjällnära skogar. Stockholm School of Economics.

Crocker, T. D., Schultze, W., Ben-David, S., & Kneese, A. V. (1979). Methods development for assessing air pollution control benefits: Vol. 1. Experiments in the economics of epidemiology. Environmental Protection Agency.

D'Arge, R., Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1972). Economics and the environment: A materials balance approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dales, J. (1968). Pollution, property and prices. University of Toronto Press.

Hartwick, J. (1977). Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 67(5), 972–974.

Hartwick, J. (1978). Substitution among exhaustible resources and intergenerational equity. Review of Economic Studies, 45(2), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297349

Henry, C. (1974). Investment decisions under uncertainty: The «irreversibility effect». American Economic Review, 64(6), 1006–1012.

Johansson, P.-O. (1987). The economic theory and measurement of environmental benefits. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511628634

Kneese, A. V. (1988). Environmental stress and political conflicts: Salinity in the Colorado River [Ponencia]. Conference on Environmental Stress and Political Conflicts, The Royal Academy of Science, Estocolmo.

Kopp, R. J., & Smith, V. K. (1989). Benefit estimation goes to court: The case of natural resource damage assessments (RfF Discussion Paper QE89-09). Resources for the Future.

Krutilla, J. (1978). The Columbia River Treaty: A study in the economics of international river basin development. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Krutilla, J. (s. f.). The international Columbia River Treaty: An economic evaluation. In A. V. Kneese & S. Smith (Eds.), Water research. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mäler, K.-G. (1974). Environmental economics: A theoretical inquiry. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mäler, K.-G. (1985). Welfare economics and the environment. In A. V. Kneese & J. L. Sweeney (Eds.), Handbook of natural resource and energy economics. North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4439(85)80004-x

Mäler, K.-G. (1989a). Environmental resources, risk and Bayesian decision rules [Manuscrito no publicado]. The World Bank.

Mäler, K.-G. (1989b). Risk and the environment [Manuscrito no publicado]. The World Bank.

Mäler, K.-G. (1989c). The acid rain game. In H. Folmer & E. van Ierland (Eds.), Valuation methods and policy making in environmental economics. Elsevier.

Mäler, K.-G. (1989d). The acid rain game 2 [Ponencia]. ESF Workshop «Economic Analysis for Environmental Toxicology», Noordwijkerhout.

Mäler, K.-G. (1989e). Valuation of costs and benefits of resource use [Manuscrito no publicado]. The World Bank.

Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Johns Hopkins University Press.

OECD. (1981). Transfrontier pollution and the role of states.

Pezzey, J. (1989). Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development (Environment Department Working Paper). The World Bank.

Repetto, R., & Gillis, M. (Eds.). (1988). Public policies and the misuse of the world's forest resources. Cambridge University Press.

Smets, H. (1972). The mutual compensation principle: An economic instrument for solving certain transfrontier pollution problems. OECD, Environment Directorate.

Solow, R. (1986). On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440280

Tietenberg, T. (1984). The emissions trading program in principle and practice: Regulatory reform in air pollution control policy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tietenberg, T. (1989). Designing marketable emission permit systems: Lessons from the U.S. experience [Ponencia]. Prince Bertil Symposium on Economic Instruments in National and International Environmental Protection Policies, Estocolmo.

Varian, H. R. (1978). Microeconomic analysis. W. W. Norton.

Warford, J. (1989). Environmental management and economic policy in developing countries. In J. Warford & G. Schramm (Eds.), Environmental management and economic development. The World Bank.

Downloads

Published

1990-10-31

How to Cite

Maler, K.-G. (1990). Economic Theory and Environmental Degradation: A Survey of Some Problems. Economic Analysis Review, 5(2), 7–17. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/256

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
369
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
350

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 76 views, 157 downloads.

0.95 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics