Environmental Resources, Public Inputs and Fiscal Constraints
Keywords:
environmental resources, public inputs, fiscal constraints, public expenditure, capital accumulation, production functionAbstract
We study the consequences of a binding constraint on the level of public expenditures directed at sustaining an environmental resource, which enters as a public input (alongside capital) into the economy-wide production function. As expected, the long run stock of that resource is reduced; however, we also find that the long run capital stock is reduced in a larger proportion. Also, the capital-environmental resource ratio becomes sensitive to changes in the rate of interest.Downloads
References
CEPAL. (1990). Crisis económica y medio ambiente en la Argentina (Documento LC/R.851). Unidad Conjunta CEPAL/PNUMA.
Chisari, O., & Fanelli, J. M. (1990). Three gap models, optimal growth and the economic dynamics of highly indebted economies (Working Paper). CEDES.
Dasgupta, P. (1982). The control of resources. Basil Blackwell.
Feehan, J. (1989). Pareto efficiency with three varieties of public input. Public Finance, (2), 236–248.
Kurz, M. (1968). The general instability of a class of competitive growth processes. Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 155–174.
Levhari, D., & Liviatan, N. (1972). On stability in the saddle-point sense. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90165-2
Mäler, K.-G. (1989). Economic theory and environmental degradation: A survey of some problems [Ponencia]. IX Latin American Meeting of the Econometric Society, Santiago de Chile.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1990 Omar Chisari, Fernando Navajas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 125
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 140
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 51 views, 89 downloads.
1.12 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics