Imperfect Competition and Trade Policies

Authors

  • José De Gregorio MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts y CIEPLAN, Santiago, Chile

Keywords:

imperfect competition, trade policy, oligopoly, strategic trade policy, rent shifting, international economics

Abstract

This paper surveys the recent developments on trade policy under imperfect competition. It is shown that in an imperfectly competitive industry trade policy may be an effective tool to divert rents towards domestic firms and consumers. The robustness of the results to the specification of the oligopoly and the rest of the economy is also reviewed. Small changes in the assumptions about the characteristics of the industry can change drastically the policy implications. Some empirical evidence to measure the effects of trade policy in oligopolistic industries are also presented. Finally there is a discussion about the relevance of these new developments as policy guidelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abreu, D. (1986). Extremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergames. Journal of Economic Theory, 39(1), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(86)90025-6

Baldwin, R. (1985). The political economy of US import policy. MIT Press.

Baldwin, R., & Krugman, P. (1987). Market access and international competition: A simulation study of 16K random access memories. In R. Feenstra (Ed.), Empirical methods for international trade. MIT Press.

Bhagwati, J. (1965). On the equivalence of tariffs and quotas. In R. Baldwin (Ed.), Trade, growth, and the balance of payments. North-Holland.

Bhagwati, J. (1971). The generalized theory of distortions and welfare. In J. Bhagwati et al. (Eds.), Trade, balance of payments, and growth. North-Holland.

Bitrán, E., & Serra, P. (1988). Trade liberalization and industrial regulation [Mimeo]. Departamento de Industrias, Universidad de Chile.

Brander, J. (1986). Rationales for strategic trade and industrial policies. In P. Krugman (Ed.), Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. MIT Press.

Brander, J., & Krugman, P. (1983). A «reciprocal dumping» model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 15(3-4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(83)80008-7

Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1981). Tariffs and the extraction of foreign monopoly rents under potential entry. Canadian Journal of Economics, 14(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/134894

Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1983). International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy. Review of Economic Studies, 50(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297771

Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1984a). Tariff protection and imperfect competition. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Monopolistic competition and international trade. Oxford University Press.

Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1984b). Trade warfare: Tariffs and cartels. Journal of International Economics, 16(3-4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(84)80002-1

Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18(1-2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6

Bresnahan, T. (1981). Duopoly models with consistent conjectures. American Economic Review, 71(5), 934–945.

Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J., & Klemperer, P. (1985). Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 488–511. https://doi.org/10.1086/261312

Cooper, R., & John, A. (1988). Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885539

Davidson, C. (1984). Cartel stability and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 17(3-4), 219–237.

Dixit, A. (1982). Recent developments in oligopoly theory. American Economic Review, 72(2), 12–17.

Dixit, A. (1984). International trade policy for oligopolistic industries. Economic Journal, 94(Suplemento), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232651

Dixit, A. (1987). Strategic aspects of trade policy. In T. Bewley (Ed.), Advances in economic theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521340446.009

Dixit, A. (1988a). Anti-dumping and countervailing duties under oligopoly. European Economic Review, 32(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90034-7

Dixit, A. (1988b). Optimal trade and industrial policies for the U.S. automobile industry. In R. Feenstra (Ed.), Empirical methods for international trade. MIT Press.

Dixit, A., & Grossman, G. (1986). Targeted export promotion with several oligopolistic industries. Journal of International Economics, 21(3-4), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(86)90038-3

Dixit, A., & Kyle, A. (1985). The use of protection and subsidies for entry promotion and deterrence. American Economic Review, 75(1), 139–152.

Dixit, A., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of international trade. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511628627

Dixit, A., & Stiglitz, J. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.

Dornbusch, R. (1987). Exchange rates and prices. American Economic Review, 77(1), 93–106.

Eaton, J., & Grossman, G. (1986). Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(2), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/1891121

Ethier, W. (1979). Internationally decreasing costs and world trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90045-x

Ffrench-Davis, R. (1968). Export quotas and allocative efficiency under market instability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 643–659.

Flam, H., & Helpman, E. (1987). Industrial policy under monopolistic competition. Journal of International Economics, 22(1-2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(87)90023-7

Friedman, J. (1971). A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 38(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296617

Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54(3), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911307

Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1986). Dynamic models of oligopoly (Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics). Harwood Academic Publishers.

Graham, F. (1923). Some aspects of protection further considered. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 37(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883929

Grossman, G. (1986). Strategic export promotion: A critique. In P. Krugman (Ed.), Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. MIT Press.

Grossman, G., & Richardson, J. (1985). Strategic trade policy: A survey of issues and early analysis (Special Paper N.º 15). International Finance Section, Princeton University.

Harris, R. (1984). Applied general equilibrium analysis of small open economies with scale economies and imperfect competition. American Economic Review, 74(5), 1016–1032.

Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press.

Horstmann, I., & Markusen, J. (1986). Up the average cost curve: Inefficient entry and the new protectionism. Journal of International Economics, 20(3-4), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(86)90020-6

Krishna, K. (1984). Trade restrictions as facilitating practices (Woodrow Wilson School Discussion Paper in Economics N.º 55). Princeton University.

Krishna, K., & Thursby, M. (1988). Optimal policies with strategic distortions (Discussion Paper N.º 1367). Harvard Institute of Economic Research.

Krugman, P. (1981). Intraindustry specialization and the gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.1086/261015

Krugman, P. (1984). Import protection as export promotion. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Monopolistic competition and international trade. Oxford University Press.

Krugman, P. (1985). Increasing returns and the theory of international trade (NBER Working Paper N.º 1752). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Krugman, P. (1986). Industrial organization and international trade (NBER Working Paper N.º 1957). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Krugman, P. (1987). Is free trade passé? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 131–144.

Lancaster, K. (1979). Variety, equity, and efficiency. Columbia University Press.

Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press.

Richardson, J. (1989). Empirical research on trade liberalization with imperfect competition (NBER Working Paper N.º 2883). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Rotemberg, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). Quotas and the stability of implicit collusion [Mimeo]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Sáez, R. (1988). Trade policy under imperfect competition: A simulation exercise for Chile [Mimeo]. Boston University.

Spence, A. (1976). Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition. Review of Economic Studies, 43(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297319

Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press.

Tornell, A. (1988). Time inconsistency of protectionist programs [Mimeo]. Columbia University.

Venables, A. (1985a). International trade and industrial policy with imperfect competition: A survey (Discussion Paper N.º 74). Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Venables, A. (1985b). Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: The case of identical products and free entry. Journal of International Economics, 19(1-2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90016-9

Venables, A. (1987). Trade and trade policy with differentiated products: A Chamberlinian-Ricardian model. Economic Journal, 97(387), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232931

Venables, A., & Smith, A. (1986). Trade and industrial policy under imperfect competition. Economic Policy, 1(3), 621–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/1344585

Published

1989-10-31

How to Cite

De Gregorio, J. (1989). Imperfect Competition and Trade Policies. Economic Analysis Review, 4(2), 19–50. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/272

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
129
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
315

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 58 views, 211 downloads.

2.44 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics