Demersal Fishing in Chile: Technical Efficiency and Scales of Operation

Authors

Keywords:

technical efficiency, stochastic frontier, fisheries, scale of operation, Chile

Abstract

This paper estimates technical efficiency in fishing activities of industrial vessels that operated during the 1990-2000 period in the "Merluccius gayi" fishery. Two algorithms -with fixed and random effects- used to estimate stochastic production frontiers are compared. The main results are: (a) There is a high and significant correlation between the effi-ciency rankings obtained with the two algorithms. (b) The fixed effect algorithm generates greater efficiency scores and more disperse efficiency distributions. (c) Both algorithms estimate greater efficiencies for larger boats and boats with more engine power. Smaller boats display greater dispersion in their estimated efficiencies. (d) Consistent estimators in-sinuate the presence of decreasing marginal returns as the fishing effort of the boat increases. (e) This last result is consistent with the evidence of congestion effects, associated to the scale of operation of the total fleet under analysis. (f) The empirical relevance of the Translog functional form is confirmed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Julio Peña T., Universidad Alberto Hurtado

Profesor Adjunto, Departamento de Economía y Administración, Universidad Alberto Hurtado-ILADES, Chile

Julio Aguirre M., INDECOPI

Analista Senior, Gerencia Estudios Económicos, Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Propiedad Intelectual (INDECOPI), Perú.

René Cerda D., Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

Profesor Titular, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile.

References

Abramovich, M. (1956). Resources and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review, 46(2), 5–23.

Aguayo, M., & Young, Z. (1982). Determinación de los factores que han incidido en los cambios de la abundancia del recurso merluza común (merluccius gayi) en el período 1968-1981. Informe Final Proyecto a Subpesca-IFOP, Chile. 70 pp.

Aguayo, M., Young, Z., Bustos, R., Robotham, H., Vera, C., & Gili, R. (1985). Diagnósticos de las principales pesquerías nacionales demersales (peces) zona centro-Sur: Estado de situación del recurso. CORFO (AP 85-41), IFOP Chile, 91 pp.

Aigner, D., Lovell, C., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5

Peña‐torres, J., & Basch, M. (2000). Harvesting in a pelagic fishery: The case of northern Chile. Annals of Operations Research, 94(1-4), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018933603839

Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01205442

Bauer, P. W., & Hancock, D. (1993). The efficiency of the federal reserve in providing check processing services. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2-3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(93)90033-a

Cerda, R., Bertrand, S., Martínez, G., Nieto, K., Urbina, M., & Yáñez, E. (2003). Evaluación del impacto socioeconómico de medidas de administración en pesquerías. Proyecto Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (FIP) 2001-30. Estud y Doc. 1/03, P. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 103 pp.

Cerda, R., Yáñez, E., Arredondo, M., Martínez, G., & Urbina, M. (1998). Evaluación bioeconómica de la pesquería industrial y artesanal del recurso merluza común en la zona centro-Sur. Proyecto Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (FIP) 95-16. Estud y Doc. 1/98 P. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 333 pp.

Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia.

Comitini, S., & Huang, D. S. (1967). A study of production and factor shares in the halibut fishing industry. Journal of Political Economy, 75(4, Part 1), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1086/259292

Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1990). Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90054-w

Farías, J. (1993). Dinámica del stock de merluza común (merluccius gayi) explotado en la zona central de Chile entre 1960 y 1990. Tesis para Optar al Título de Ingeniero Pesquero, ECMUniversidad Católica de Valparaíso, 79 pp.

Felthoven, R. G. (2002). Effects of the American fisheries Act on capacity, utilization and technical efficiency. Marine Resource Economics, 17(3), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.17.3.42629363

Greene, W. H. (1980a). Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions. Journal of Econometrics, 13(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90041-x

Greene, W. H. (1980b). On the estimation of a flexible frontier production model. Journal of Econometrics, 13(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90045-7

Greene, W. H. (1990). A gamma-Distributes stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1/2), 141–163.

Hannesson, R. (1983). Bioeconomic production function in fisheries: Theoretical and empirical analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40(7), 968–982. https://doi.org/10.1139/f83-123

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

Jin, D., Thunberg, E., Kite-Powell, H., & Blake, K. (2002). Total factor productivity change in the new England groundfish fishery: 1964–1993. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(3), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1213

Johnston J, J. (1997). Econometric methods. 4th Edition, McGraw Hill.

Jondrow, J., Knox Lovell, C., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2-3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5

Kirkley, J. E., Squires, D., & Strand, I. E. (1995). Assessing technical efficiency in commercial fisheries: The mid‐Atlantic sea scallop fishery. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 686–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243235

Kodde, D. A., & Palm, F. C. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica, 54(5), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912331

Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). Production frontiers, panel data, and time-varying technical inefficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90055-x

Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174411

Libecap, G. D. (1989). Contracting for property rights. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664120

Meeusen, W., & Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757

Pavez, P. (1977). Análisis de la situación actual y algunas alternativas de manejo de la pesquería de la merluza común (merluccius gayi) en Chile. ECMA-UCV, Mimeo, 28 pp.

Peña-Torres, J. (1997). The political economy of fishing regulation: The case of Chile. Marine Resource Economics, 12(4), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.12.4.42629203

Peña-Torres, J. (2002). ¿Privatizar el mar? ¿Subsidiar? O ¿Muerte anunciada de la pesca extractiva en Chile? Debates sobre cuotas individuales transferibles. Estudios Públicos, 86, 183–222.

Peña Torres, J., Basch, M., & Vergara, S. (2003). EFICIENCIA TECNICA Y ESCALAS DE OPERACION EN PESCA PELAGICA: UN ANALISIS DE FRONTERAS ESTOCASTICAS. Cuadernos de economía, 40(119), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-68212003011900002

Peña-Torres, J., Vergara, S., & Basch, M. (2004). El dilema de la escala productiva frente a ciclos de abundancia: La pesca industrial en Chile. El Trimestre Económico N° 283 (julioseptiembre) (forthcoming).

Quinn Ii, T. J., & Deriso, R. B. (1999). Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University PressNew York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195076318.001.0001

Reifschneider, D., & Stevenson, R. (1991). Systematic departures from the frontier: A framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. International Economic Review, 32(3), 715–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527115

Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1984). Production frontiers and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1984.10509410

Scott, A. (1993). Obstacles to fishery self-Government. Marine Resource Economics, 8(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.8.3.42629065

Serra, R., & Barria, P. (1992). Investigación y estimación de la captura total permisible para el jurel año 1992. Reporte Técnico, IFOP, Valparaíso, Chile.

Sharma, K. R., & Leung, P. (1998). Technical efficiency of the longline fishery in hawaii: An application of a stochastic production frontier. Marine Resource Economics, 13(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.13.4.42629241

Squires, D. (1992). Productivity measurement in common property resource industries: An application to the pacific coast trawl fishery. The RAND Journal of Economics, 23(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555985

Squires, D., Grafton, R. Q., Alam, M. F., & Omar, I. H. (1998). Where the land meets the sea: Integrated sustainable fisheries development and artisanal fishing. Working Paper 98-26, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.

Stevenson, R. E. (1980). Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. Journal of Econometrics, 13(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90042-1

Viswanathan, K. K., Omar, I. H., Jeon, Y., Kirkley, J., Squires, D., & Susilowati, I. (2001). Fishing skill in developing country fisheries: The kedah, Malaysia trawl fishery. Marine Resource Economics, 16(4), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.16.4.42629339

Yáñez, E., Barbieri, M., & Silva, C. (2003). Fluctuaciones ambientales de baja frecuencia y principales pesquerías pelágicas chilenas. en E. Yañez (ed.) Actividad Pesquera y de Acuicultura en Chile, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, P. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 109–121.

Yáñez, E., Pizarro, L., & Alberti, M. (1985). Dinámica del stock de merluza común (merluccius gayi) explotado en la zona central de Chile (30ºS – 40ºS) entre 1960 y 1982. en T. Melo (ed.), Estudios en Pesquerías Chilenas, ECM – Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 67–74.

Zellner, A., Kmenta, J., & Dreze, J. (1966). Specification and estimation of cobb-Douglas production function models. Econometrica, 34(4), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910099

Published

2004-04-30

How to Cite

Peña T., J., Aguirre M., J., & Cerda D., R. (2004). Demersal Fishing in Chile: Technical Efficiency and Scales of Operation. Economic Analysis Review, 19(1), 119–160. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/37

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
130
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
264

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 65 views, 127 downloads.

2.03 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics