Conditional Predictive Ability of Exchange Rates in Long Run Regressions

Authors

  • Pablo Pincheira Chimera Research Group

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000200001

Keywords:

Exchange rate predictability, conditional predictive ability, Bayesian shrinkage, ridge regression, forecast evaluation

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate exchange rate predictability using a framework developed by Giacomini and White (2006). This new framework tests for conditional predictive ability rather than unconditional predictive ability, which has been the standard approach. Using several shrinkage based forecasting methods, including new methods proposed here, we evaluate conditional predictability of five bilateral exchange rates at differing horizons. Our results indicate that for most currencies a random walk would not be the optimal forecasting method in a real time forecasting exercise, at least for some predictive horizons. We also show that our proposed shrinkage methods in general perform on par with Bayesian shrinkage and ridge regressions, and sometimes they even perform better.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chinn, M., & Meese, R. A. (1995). Banking on currency forecasts: How predictable is change in money? Journal of International Economics, 38, 161–178.

Clark, T., & West, K. (2006). Using out-of-sample mean squared prediction errors to test the martingale difference hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics, 135(1-2), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.014

Diebold, F., & Mariano, R. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 253–263.

Giacomini, R., & White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica, 74(6), 1545–1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00718.x

Kilian, L. (1999). Exchange rates and monetary fundamentals: What do we learn from long-horizon regressions? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 491–510.

Litterman, R. B. (1986). Forecasting with Bayesian vector autoregressions: Five years of experience. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 4, 25–38.

MacDonald, R., & Marsh, I. (1997). On fundamentals and exchange rates: A Casselian perspective. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 655–664.

Mark, N. (1995). Exchange rates and fundamentals: Evidence on long-horizon predictability. American Economic Review, 85, 201–218.

McCracken, M. (2004). Asymptotics for out-of-sample tests of causality [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Missouri.

McCracken, M., & Sapp, S. (2005). Evaluating the predictability of exchange rates using long horizon regressions. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(3), 473–494.

Meese, R., & Rogoff, K. (1983a). Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: Do they fit out of sample? Journal of International Economics, 14, 3–24.

Meese, R., & Rogoff, K. (1983b). The out-of-sample failure of empirical exchange rate models? In J. Frenkel (Ed.), Exchange rates and international macroeconomics (pp. 67–105). University of Chicago Press.

Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semidefinite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610

West, K. (1996). Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. Econometrica, 64, 1067–1084.

West, K. (2006). Forecast evaluation. In G. Elliott, C. W. Granger, & A. Timmermann (Eds.), Handbook of economic forecasting (Vol. 1) 99–134. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0706(05)01003-7

Downloads

Published

2013-11-03

How to Cite

Pincheira, P. (2013). Conditional Predictive Ability of Exchange Rates in Long Run Regressions. Economic Analysis Review, 28(2), 2–36. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000200001

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
398
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
360

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 73 views, 136 downloads.

0.90 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics