Universal Child Allowance and School Delay of Children In Argentina*

Authors

  • Vanesa Valeria D’Elia Chimera Research Group
  • Ana Ines Navarro Universidad Austral image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000200003

Keywords:

Universal Child Allowance, poverty-alleviation program, schooling gap, Argentina

Abstract

This paper empirically explores the effect of the Universal Child Allowance –a conditional Cash Transfer Program recently launched in Argentina– on backwardness in school. Specifically, we evaluate whether children enrolled in the program closed their education gap, differentiating between children and adolescents.

Using propensity score as a prelude to the estimation of regression, we found preliminary evidence that the government subsidy affects primary and secondary students differently. The results are robust to different uses of the different samples and comparison samples observation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, L. (2001). Social mobility in Latin America: Links with adolescent schooling (IADB Research Network Working Paper No. R-433). Inter-American Development Bank.

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72

Attanasio, O., Fitzsimons, E., & Gómez, A. (2005). The impact of a conditional education subsidy on school enrolment in Colombia [IFS Briefing]. Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Baez, J. E., & Camacho, A. (2011). Assessing the long-term effects of conditional cash transfers on human capital: Evidence from Colombia (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5751). Institute for the Study of Labor. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5681

Behrman, J. R., Birdsall, N., & Szekely, M. (1998). Intergenerational schooling mobility and macro conditions and schooling policies in Latin America (IADB Research Department Working Paper No. 386). Inter-American Development Bank.

Behrman, J. R., Gaviria, A., & Szekely, M. (2001). Intergenerational mobility in Latin America (Working Paper No. 452). Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

Behrman, J. R., & Parker, S. W. (2008). Following young adults who benefited from Oportunidades for nearly a decade: Impact of the program on rural education and achievement, 10 years of intervention. In Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (Ed.), External evaluation of Oportunidades 2008 in rural areas (1997–2007) (Vol. 1, pp. 201–238).

Behrman, J. R., Parker, S. W., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Long-term impacts of the Oportunidades conditional cash transfer program on rural youth in Mexico (Discussion Paper No. 122). Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.

Bertranou, F., & Maurizio, R. (2012). Semi-conditional cash transfers in the form of family allowances for children and adolescents in the informal economy in Argentina. International Social Security Review, 65(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246x.2011.01419.x

Bobonis, G., & Fred, F. F. (2009). Endogenous social interaction effects in school participation in rural Mexico. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 695–716.

Centro de Estudios en Políticas Públicas (CEPP), Universidad de Buenos Aires, & Banco Santander Río. (2011). Informe de resultados: Asignación Universal por Hijo (AUH) [Results report: Universal child allowance] (Observatorio de la Educación Básica Argentina).

Conconi, A., Cruces, G., Olivieri, S., & Sánchez, R. (2008). E pur si muove? Movilidad, pobreza y desigualdad en América Latina [And yet it moves? Mobility, poverty, and inequality in Latin America]. Económica, 54(1–2), 121–159.

Crump, R. K., Hotz, V. J., Imbens, G. W., & Mitnik, O. A. (2006). Moving the goalposts: Addressing limited overlap in the estimation of average treatment effects by changing the estimand (NBER Technical Working Paper No. 330). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Dahan, M., & Gaviria, A. (2001). Sibling correlations and social mobility in Latin America. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(3), 537–555.

Dee, T. S. (2011). Conditional cash penalties in education: Evidence from the Learnfare experiment. Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.013

Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present & future poverty. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1

Galasso, E. (2006). With their effort and one opportunity: Alleviating extreme poverty in Chile [Unpublished manuscript]. World Bank.

Galasso, E., & Ravallion, M. (2004). Social protection in a crisis: Argentina's Plan Jefes y Jefas. The World Bank Economic Review, 18(3), 367–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhh044

Gasparini, L., & Cruces, G. (2010). Las asignaciones universales por hijo: Impacto, discusión y alternativas [Universal child allowances: Impact, discussion, and alternatives] (Documento de Trabajo CEDLAS No. 102). Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Gasparini, L., Haimovich, F., & Olivieri, S. (2007). Labor informality effects of a poverty-alleviation program (Documento de Trabajo No. 53). CEDLAS.

Glewwe, P., & Kassouf, L. (2012). The impact of the Bolsa Escola/Familia conditional cash transfer program on enrolment, grade promotion and drop out rates in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 505–517.

Glewwe, P., & Olinto, P. (2004). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfers on schooling: An experimental analysis of Honduras [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Minnesota.

González Rozada, M. (2010). Las AUH: ¿Pan para hoy, hambre para mañana? [The universal child allowance: Bread today, hunger tomorrow?]. Foco Económico.

Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). (2011). Social safety nets: An evaluation of World Bank support, 2000–2010. World Bank Group.

Maluccio, J. A., & Flores, R. (2005). Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social (Research Report No. 141). International Food Policy Research Institute.

Navarro, A. I. (2011). Effect of Argentinean program for unemployed heads of households on children's schooling gap. International Business: Research, Teaching and Practice, 5(2), 60–86.

Perova, E., & Vakis, R. (2009). Welfare impacts of the "Juntos" program in Peru: Evidence from a non-experimental evaluation. World Bank.

Ponce, J., & Bedi, A. S. (2010). The impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive achievement: The Bono de Desarrollo Humano of Ecuador. Economics of Education Review, 29(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.005

Schady, N., & Araujo, M. C. (2008). Cash transfers, conditions, and school enrollment in Ecuador. Economía, 8(2), 3–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.0.0004

Skoufias, E., & McClafferty, B. (2001). Is PROGRESA working? Summary of the results of an evaluation by IFPRI (FCND Discussion Paper No. 118). International Food Policy Research Institute.

Soares, F. V., Perez Ribas, R., & Guerreiro Osorio, R. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil's Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100009390

Downloads

Published

2013-11-03

How to Cite

Valeria D’Elia, V., & Ines Navarro, A. (2013). Universal Child Allowance and School Delay of Children In Argentina*. Economic Analysis Review, 28(2), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000200003

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
473
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
597

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 62 views, 120 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 10 · Crossref 2

1.26 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics