Real Exchange Rates in the Long and Short Run: A Panel Co-Integration Approach

Authors

Keywords:

real exchange rate, new open economy macroeconomics, panel cointegration, half-life, capital controls

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to tackle the empirical issues of the real exchange rate literature by applying recently developed panel cointe-gration techniques to a structural long-run real exchange rate equation. Using annual data for 67 countries over 1966-97, we find evidence of cointegration between the real exchange rate and its fundamentals. I also find: (a) evidence of cointegration holds for all sub-samples of countries (classified by income or capital controls), (b) parameter cons-tancy across units holds only for high income countries and low capital controls, (c) structural change in the cointegrating relationship around 1973, (d) estimated parameters consistent with theoretical values im-plied with calibrated parameters of preferences and technology, (e) deviations from the equilibrium are large and persistent with half-life (between 2.8 and 5) consistent with the consensus interval of 2.5-5 found in the literature (Murray and Papell, 2002).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews, D. W. K. (1993). Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica, 61(4), 821–856. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951764

Baltagi, B. H., & Kao, C. (2000). Non-Stationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: A survey. Mimeo. University of Syracuse.

Balvers, R. J., & H. Bergstrand, J. (1997). Equilibrium real exchange rates: Closed-form theoretical solutions and some empirical evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 16(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-5606(97)00002-8

Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of Some unit root tests for panel data. in B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), Non-Stationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Vol, 15, 161–178.

Calderón, C. (2002a). Empirical essays in open economy macroeconomics. University of Rochester, Ph.D. Dissertation.

Calderón, C. (2002b). Real exchange rate in the long and short run: A panel cointegration approach. Working Paper 153, Central Bank of Chile.

Calderón, C., Loayza, N., & Serven, L. (2000). External sustainability: A stock equilibrium perspective. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2281

Canzoneri, M. B., Cumby, R. E., & Diba, B. (1999). Relative labor productivity and the real exchange rate in the long run: Evidence for a panel of OECD countries. Journal of International Economics, 47(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(98)00021-x

Chiang, M. H., & Kao, C. (2000). Non-Stationary panel time Series using NPT 1.2: A user guide. Mimeo. Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University.

Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6

Edwards, S. (1989). Real exchange rates. Devaluation, and Adjustment. The MIT Press, Mass.

Engel, C. (1993). Real exchange rates and relative prices. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90034-d

Engel, C. (2000). Long-run PPP may not hold after all. Journal of International Economics, 51(2), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(99)00011-2

Engel, C. M., & Rogers, J. H. (1996). How wide is the border? American Economic Review, 86(5), 1112–1125.

Faruqee, H. (1995). Long-Run determinants of the real exchange rate: A stock-Flow perspective. IMF Staff Papers, 42(1), 80–107.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00023-2

Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15(1), 179–222.

Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2000). Testing for structural change of a cointegrated regressions in panel data. Mimeo. Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University.

Kao, C., Chiang, M. H., & Chen, B. (1999). International R&D spillovers: An application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(s1), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.16

Karlsson, S., & Löthgren, M. (2000). On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economics Letters, 66(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(99)00237-2

Kraay, A., Loayza, N., Serven, L., & Ventura, J. (2000). Country portfolios. NBER Working Paper 7795, Cambridge, Mass.

Lane, P. R., & -M. Milesi-Ferreti, G. (2000). The transfer problem revisited: Net foreign assets and real exchange rates. IMF Working Paper WP/00/123, Washington, DC.

Lucas, R. E. (1982). Interest rates and currency prices in a two-country world. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90032-0

McDonald, R., & Stein, J. (1999). Equilibrium exchange rates. Kluwer Academic.

Mendoza, E. G. (1991). Real business cycle in a small open economy. American Economic Review, 81(4), 797–818.

Murray, C. J., & Papell, D. H. (2002). The purchasing power parity persistence paradigm. Journal of International Economics, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(01)00107-6

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1995). Exchange rate dynamics redux. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 624–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/261997

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1996). Foundations of international macroeconomics. The MIT Press, Mass.

Obstfeld, M., & Taylor, A. M. (1997). Nonlinear aspects of goods-Market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckscher's commodity points revisited. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 11(4), 441–479. https://doi.org/10.1006/jjie.1997.0385

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford. Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 653–678.

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time Series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(2).

Phillips, P. C. B., & Loretan, M. (1991). Estimating long-Run economic equilibria. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), 407–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298004

Phillips, P. C. B., & Moon, H. R. (1999). Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica, 67(5), 1057–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00070

Rider, M. (1994). External debt and liabilities of industrial countries. Research Discussion Paper 9405, Reserve Bank of Australia.

Sercu, P., & Uppal, R. (2000). Exchange rate volatility, trade, and capital flows under alternative exchange rate regimes. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511549281

Stockman, A. C. (1987). The equilibrium approach to the exchange rates. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Review, 73(1), 12–30.

Stockman, A. C., & Tesar, L. L. (1995). Tastes and technology in a two-Country model of the business cycle: Explaining international co-Movements. American Economic Review, 85(1), 168–185.

Taylor, M. P., & Sarno, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46(2), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(97)00054-8

Wei, S. J., & Parsley, D. C. (1995). Purchasing power parity during the floating rate period: Exchange rate volatility, trade barriers and other culprits. NBER Working Paper 5032, Cambridge, Mass.

Downloads

Published

2004-10-31

How to Cite

Calderón, C. (2004). Real Exchange Rates in the Long and Short Run: A Panel Co-Integration Approach. Economic Analysis Review, 19(2), 41–83. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/39

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
179
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
640

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 65 views, 155 downloads.

3.58 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics