An Investigation of Cross-Country Income Differences

Authors

Keywords:

cross-country income inequality, development, total factor productivity, aggregate production function, schooling

Abstract

This paper investigates the nature of income inequality across nations. Several exercises, such as variance decompositions, simulations and counter-factual analyses are performed. We find that, although total factor productivity has a leading role in explaining the dispersion of output per worker, countries grew in the past –and, consequently, are poor in the present– for different reasons. Even after correcting for productivity differences, some nations remain poor mostly because of low schooling of the labor force and other because they impose too many distortions to capital accumulation. Policy recommendations have to take country differences into account, or else they have a high chance of being either wrong or ineffective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369

Barro, R., & Lee, J. W. (1996). International measures of schooling years and schooling quality. American Economic Review, 86(2), 218–223.

Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009746629269

Bills, M., & Klenow, P. (2000). Does schooling causes growth? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1160–1183.

Bosworth, B., & Collins, S. (2003). The empirics of growth: An update. Brookings Panel on Economic Activity, September.

Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., & McGrattan, E. (1997). The poverty of nations: A quantitative investigation. Research Department Staff Report 204, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Revised October 1997).

Cooley, T., & Prescott, E. (1995). Economic growth and business cycles. in T. Cooley and E. Prescott (eds.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. The Economic Journal, 90(358), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231790

Ferreira, P. C., Issler, J. V., & De Abreu Pessôa, S. (2003). Testing production functions used in empirical growth studies. Economics Letters, 83(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.09.024

Ferreira, P. C., & Trejos, A. (2005). ON THE OUTPUT EFFECTS OF BARRIERS TO TRADE*. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1319–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00415.x

Gollin, D. (2002). Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1086/338747

Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do Some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954

Herrendorf, B., & Teixeira, A. (2005). How barriers to international trade affect TFP. forthcoming, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.

Hidalgo, A., & Erosa, A. (2005). On capital market imperfections as an origin of low TFP and economic rents. manuscript, University of Toronto.

Jones, C. I. (1997). Convergence revisited. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009762900799

Klenow, P. J., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (1997). The neoclassical revival in growth economics: Has it gone too far? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1086/654324

Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy: 1820-1992. OECD.

Mankiw, N. G., Phelps, E. S., & Romer, P. M. (1995). The growth of nations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534576

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477

Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling. Experience, and Earning, National Bureau of Economic Research, distributed by Columbia University Press.

Parente, S. L., & Prescott, E. C. (1999). Monopoly rights: A barrier to riches. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1216–1233. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.5.1216

Prescott, E. C. (1998). Lawrence R. Klein lecture 1997: Needed: A theory of total factor productivity. International Economic Review, 39(3), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527389

Prichett, L. (1997). Divergence, big time. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 3–17.

Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(94)90007-8

Restuccia, D., & Urrutia, C. (2001). Relative prices and investment rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(00)00049-0

Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991). The Penn world Table (mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-1988. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 327–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937941

Willis, R. J. (1986). Wage determinants: A survey and reinterpretation of human capital earnings functions. in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 1, North-Holland. Chapter 10, 525–602.

Downloads

Published

2005-10-31

How to Cite

Cavalcanti Ferreira, P., Issler, J. V., & de Abreu Pessoa, S. (2005). An Investigation of Cross-Country Income Differences. Economic Analysis Review, 20(2), 3–21. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/48

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2005)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2005 Pedro Cavalcanti Ferreira, Joao Victor Issler, Samuel de Abreu Pessoa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
264
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
471

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 20% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 20%.

Last 2 years: 98 views, 119 downloads.

Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. United States 15% · Singapore 12% · Spain 9%

1.78 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics