Nonlinearities in the Monetary Policy Rule of the Central Bank of Chile: Empirical Evidence

Authors

  • Pablo González Universidad Alberto Hurtado image/svg+xml
  • Mauricio Tejada Cámara Chilena de la Construcción

Keywords:

inflation targeting, reaction function, nonlinear models, business cycle, Chile

Abstract

This paper analyzes the evidence of non-linearities in the reaction function of the Central Bank of Chile as it relates to its final objective, inflation, and/or to its intermediate objectives defined by the monetary policy transmission channels. The study uses the flexible approach to non-linear inference proposed by Hamilton (2001), which allows the estimation of non-linear functions by using the data to determine the specific form of the non-linearity to be adopted instead of making any prior assumption of a particular functional form. It is observed that even though the Central Bank’s response is linear in relation to the deviations of the inflation rate from its target, there is evidence of non-linearities with respect to the business cycle. Contrary to previous studies, in particular Corbo (2002), the current account gap does not have any predictive role in the reaction function for the period being analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pablo González, Universidad Alberto Hurtado

Investigador Asociado, Programa de Postgrado en Economía, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile.

Mauricio Tejada, Cámara Chilena de la Construcción

Economista, Gerencia de Estudios, Cámara Chilena de la Construcción, Santiago, Chile.

References

Aksoy, Y., De Grauwe, P., & Dewachter, H. (2002). Do asymmetries matter for European monetary policy? European Economic Review, 46(3), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00160-x

Bec, F., Ben Salem, M., & Collard, F. (2002). Asymmetries in monetary policy reaction function: Evidence for U.S. French and German central banks. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1006

Bond, D., Harrison, M., & O’brien, E. J. (2003). Investigating nonlinearity: A note on the implementation of hamilton’s methodology. Mimeo, Trinity College Dublin Economics Department.

Cabrera, A., & Lagos, L. F. (2002). Monetary policy in Chile: A black box? en N. Loayza y K. Schmidt-Hebbel (eds.), Monetary Policy: Rules and Transmission Mechanisms, Central Bank of Chile, 197–246.

Calderón, C., Duncan, R., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2004). The role of credibility in the cyclical properties of macroeconomic policies in emerging economies. Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers Series Nº 285, 1–33.

Cecchetti, S. G., & Ehrmann, M. (2002). Does inflation targeting increase output volatility?: An international comparison of policymakers’ preferences and outcomes. en N. Loayza y K. Schmidt-Hebbel (eds.), Monetary Policy: Rules and Transmission Mechanisms, Central Bank of Chile, 247–74.

Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1998). Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. European Economic Review, 42(6), 1033–67.

Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661–1707. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1661

Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (2000). Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and Some theory*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554692

Contreras, G., & García, P. (2002). Estimating gaps and trends for the Chilean economy. Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers Series Nº 165, junio, 1–33.

Corbo, V. (2002). Monetary policy in Latin America in the 90s. en N. Loayza y K. SchmidtHebbel (eds.), Monetary Policy: Rules and Transmission Mechanisms, Central Bank of Chile, 95–116.

Cukierman, A. (2000). The inflation bias result revisited. Mimeo, Tel-Aviv University.

Dahl, C. M. (2002). An investigation of tests for linearity and the accuracy of likelihood based inference using random fields. The Econometrics Journal, 5(2), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423x.00084

Dahl, C. M., & González-Rivera, G. (2003). Testing for neglected nonlinearity in regression models based on the theory of random fields. Journal of Econometrics, 114(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(02)00222-1

Dolado, J. J., Marı́a-Dolores, R., & Naveira, M. (2005). Are monetary-policy reaction functions asymmetric?: The role of nonlinearity in the Phillips curve. European Economic Review, 49(2), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(03)00032-1

Dolado, J., Pedrero, R. M. D., & Ruge-Murcia, F. J. (2004). Nonlinear monetary policy rules: Some new evidence for the U.S. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 8(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1155

Escandon, A., Gajardo, P., & Venegas, J. (2005). Indicador mensual de actividad económica imacec base 1996: Nota metodológica. Central Bank of Chile, Economic Studies Series Nº 48, Octubre, 1–43.

Favero, C. A. (2001). Applied macroeconometrics. Oxford University Press, 1ª edición.

Gerlach, S. (2000). Asymmetric policy reactions and inflation. Mimeo, University of Basel.

Gerlach, S., & Smets, F. (1999). Output gaps and monetary policy in the EMU area. European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00095-6

Hamilton, J. D. (2001). A parametric approach to flexible nonlinear inference. Econometrica, 69(3), 537–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00205

Hamilton, J. D. (2003). What is an oil shock? Journal of Econometrics, 113(2), 363–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(02)00207-5

Kim, D. H., Osborn, D. R., & Sensier, M. (2005). Nonlinearity in the fed's monetary policy rule. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(5), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.792

Lohmann, S. (1992). Optimal commitment in monetary policy: Credibility versus flexibility. American Economic Review, 82(1), 273–86.

Medina, J. P., & Valdés, R. O. (2002). Optimal monetary policy rules under inflation range targeting. en N. Loayza y K. Schmidt-Hebbel (eds.), Monetary Policy: Rules and Transmission Mechanisms, Central Bank of Chile, 95–116.

Morandé, F. (2002). A decade of inflation targeting in Chile: Developments, lessons, and challenges. en N. Loayza y R. Soto (eds.), Inflation Targeting: Design, Performance and Challenges, Central Bank of Chile, 583–625.

Orphanides, A. (2001). Monetary policy rules based on real-Time data. American Economic Review, 91(4), 964–985. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.964

Parrado, E., & Velasco, A. (2002). Alternative monetary rules in the open economy: A welfare based approach. en N. Loayza y R. Soto (eds.), Inflation Targeting: Design, Performance, Challenges, Central Bank of Chile, 295–347.

Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Tapia, M. (2002). Inflation targeting in Chile. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1062-9408(02)00076-1

Soto, R. (1996). El tipo de cambio real de equilibrio: Un modelo no lineal de Series de tiempo. ILADES-Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Documento de Investigación I-94.

Surico, P. (2004). Inflation targeting and nonlinear policy rules: The case of asymmetric preferences. Mimeo, Bocconi University.

Svensson, L. E. (1999). Inflation targeting as a monetary policy rule. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(3), 607–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(99)00007-0

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l

Published

2006-04-30

How to Cite

González, P., & Tejada, M. (2006). Nonlinearities in the Monetary Policy Rule of the Central Bank of Chile: Empirical Evidence. Economic Analysis Review, 21(1), 81–115. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/55

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
149
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
305

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 70 views, 148 downloads.

2.05 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics