Total factor productivity for the Chilean construction sector (1986-2015)

Authors

  • Byron J. Idrovo-Aguirre Gerencia de Estudios Cámara Chilena de la Construcción
  • Victor Daniel Serey Gerencia de Estudios Cámara Chilena de la Construcción

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702018000100029

Keywords:

Productivity, construction, Kalman filter, Chile

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) for the Chilean Construction Sector, considering an annual period between 1986 and 2015. The contribution of the productivity to the sectorial growth is estimated residually, based on a Cobb-Douglas production function for the sectorial GDP and independent measures for capital and labor, corrected by quality and intensity of use. As a result, the sectorial TFP has exhibited a downward trend in the last five years, after remaining virtually flat since 1986 to 2011. The economic growth of the sector shows to be dominated by the accumulation of factors rather than by the efficiency with which they are used in the productive process. This could explain, partially, the vulnerability of sectorial activity to the economic cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astorga, R. (2011). Causas del menor ritmo de crecimiento económico en Chile: Una perspectiva sectorial [Causes of the slower pace of economic growth in Chile: A sectoral perspective] [Tesis de magíster, Universidad de Chile].

Bergoeing, R., Kehoe, P., Kehoe, T., & Soto, R. (2002). Policy-driven productivity in Chile and Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 92(2), 16–21.

Betancor, A. (2009). Productividad del sector construcción [Productivity of the construction sector] (Documentos de Trabajo N.º 40). Cámara Chilena de la Construcción.

Chumacero, R., & Fuentes, R. (2006). Chilean growth dynamics. Economic Modelling, 23(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2005.08.003

Coeymans, J. E. (1999). Determinantes de la productividad en Chile [Determinants of productivity in Chile]. Cuadernos de Economía, 107, 597–637.

De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1999). Economic growth in Latin America: Sources and prospects (Documentos de Trabajo N.º 66). Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.

De la Huerta, C., & García, C. (2016). Commodity prices, growth and productivity: A sectoral view (Documentos de Trabajo N.º 777). Banco Central de Chile.

Fuentes, R., Larraín, M., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2004). Fuentes del crecimiento y comportamiento de la productividad total de factores en Chile [Sources of growth and behavior of total factor productivity in Chile] (Documentos de Trabajo N.º 287). Banco Central de Chile.

Magendzo, I., & Villena, M. (2012). Evolución de la productividad total de factores en Chile [Evolution of total factor productivity in Chile] [Informe técnico]. Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez.

Solimano, A., & Soto, R. (2003). Latin American economic growth in the late 20th century: Evidence and interpretation [Documento presentado en el seminario "Latin America Growth: Why so Slow?"].

Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047

Vergara, R., & Rivero, R. (2006). Productividad sectorial en Chile: 1986–2001 [Sectoral productivity in Chile: 1986–2001]. Cuadernos de Economía, 43(127), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-68212006000100005

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Idrovo-Aguirre, B. J., & Serey, V. D. (2018). Total factor productivity for the Chilean construction sector (1986-2015). Economic Analysis Review, 33(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702018000100029

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
119
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
287

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 68 views, 118 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 3 · Crossref 3

2.41 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics