Social capital and subjective well-being: a study of the role of participation in social organizations in life satisfaction and happiness in Chilean cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702020000100055Keywords:
Subjective well-being, participation, ordered bivariate probitAbstract
The concept of welfare has evolved to incorporate subjective elements. One key factor for development is social capital. Participation in organizations promotes a more active social life, with potential positive results on welfare. This work investigates this last association through the estimation of a bivariate ordered probit model by using the World Value Survey for Chile. Results show a positive association between participation in organizations and satisfaction with the economic situation, however, in the case of life satisfaction and happiness, this effect is unclear for economic and recreational organizations. This result suggests that subjective well-being do not necessarily respond to the economic situation.
Downloads
References
Aker, J. (2007). Social networks and household welfare in Tanzania: Working together to get out of poverty (SSRN Scholarly Paper N.º 995941). Social Science Research Network.
Basmann, R. (1960). On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(292), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483365
Bharadwaj, L., & Wilkening, E. (1977). The prediction of perceived well-being. Social Indicators Research, 4(1), 4–421.
Calvo, E., & Beytia, P. (2011). ¿Cómo medir la felicidad? [How to measure happiness?]. Claves para Políticas Públicas, 4, 1–9.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
Durston, J. (1999). Construyendo capital social comunitario [Building community social capital]. Revista de la CEPAL, 69, 103–118.
Fleeson, W., Malanos, A., & Achille, N. (2002). An intra-individual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as "good" as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1409–1422.
Greene, W. (1999). Econometric analysis. Macmillan.
Herreros, F. (2002). ¿Son las relaciones sociales una fuente de recursos? Una definición del capital social [Are social relations a source of resources? A definition of social capital]. Papers, 67, 129–148.
Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00319.x
IDH. (2012). Bienestar subjetivo: El desafío de repensar el desarrollo en Chile [Subjective well-being: The challenge of rethinking development in Chile]. http://desarrollohumano.cl/idh/informes/2012-bienestar-subjetivo-el-desafio-de-repensar-el-desarrollo/
Kliksberg, B. (1999). Capital social y cultura, claves esenciales del desarrollo [Social capital and culture: Essential keys to development]. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/12190
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
PNUD. (2000). Asociatividad y capital social [Associativity and social capital]. En Desarrollo humano en Chile (pp. 107–172). Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
Ponce, M., Rosas, R., & Lorca, M. (2014). Social capital, social participation and life satisfaction among Chilean older adults. Revista de Saúde Pública, 48(5), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048004759
Portela, M., & Neira, I. (2012). Capital social y bienestar subjetivo. Un análisis para España considerando sus regiones [Social capital and subjective well-being: An analysis for Spain considering its regions]. Investigaciones Regionales, (23), 5–27.
Puntscher, S., Hauser, C., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2014). The impact of social capital on subjective well-being: A regional perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9555-y
Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Salazar, C., & Jaime, M. (2009). Participación en organizaciones sociales en Chile: ¿Una alternativa para mejorar el bienestar económico de los hogares en Chile? [Participation in social organizations in Chile: An alternative to improve household economic well-being in Chile?]. Estudios de Economía, 36(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52862009000200003
Veenhoven, R. (1994). El estudio de la satisfacción con la vida [The study of life satisfaction]. Intervención Psicosocial, 3, 87–116.
World Value Survey. (2012). World Value Survey. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Jorge Aedo, Estefany Oñate, Marcela Jaime, César Salazar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 122
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 186
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 15% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 15%.
Last 2 years: 110 views, 141 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 12 · Crossref 9
1.52 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
