Return Autocorrelation Anomalies in Two European Stock Markets
Keywords:
return autocorrelation, stock market anomalies, non-trading periods, market efficiency, EuropeAbstract
The autocorrelation in stock returns is one of the most important anomalies in financial markets worldwide. In this paper, we have investigated differences in return autocorrelation on a day-to-day basis in the Spanish and French stock markets. Our research provides strong evidence of the importance of non-trading periods, not only weekends and holidays but also overnight closings, to explain return autocorrelation anomalies. While close-to-close stock returns are highly autocorrelated, specially on Mondays, when we compute daily returns on an open-to-close basis they do not exhibit a significant level of autocorrelation.Downloads
References
Abraham, A., & Ikenberry, D. L. (1994). The individual investor and the weekend effect. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331225
Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1989). Divide and conquer: A theory of intraday and day-of-the-Week mean effects. Review of Financial Studies, 2(2), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/2.2.189
Bessembinder, H., & Hertzel, M. G. (1993). Return autocorrelations around non trading days. Review of Financial Studies, 6(1), 155–189.
Campbell, J. Y., Grossman, S. J., & Wang, J. (1993). Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 905–939. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118454
Cross, F. (1973). The behavior of stock prices on fridays and mondays. Financial Analyst Journal, 29, 67–69.
Dimson, E., & Marsh, P. (1986). Event study methodologies and the size effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(86)90008-5
Foster, F. D., & Viswanathan, S. (1990). A theory of the interday variations in volume, variance, and trading costs in securities markets. Review of Financial Studies, 3(4), 593–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/3.4.593
Garcia Blandon, J. (2001). New findings regarding the investigation of the Spanish stock market seasonalities: A note. UPF Working Paper Series, 585.
Groth, J. C., Lewellen, W., Schlarbaum, G., & Lease, R. (1979). An analysis of brokerage house security recommendations. Financial Analyst Journal, 35 (Jan.-Feb.), 23–40.
Jaffe, J., & Westerfield, R. (1985). The week-End effect in common stock returns: The international evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40(2), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327894
Keim, D. B., & Stambaugh, R. F. (1984). A further investigation of the weekend effect in stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 819–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03675.x
Lakonishok, J., & Maberly, E. (1990). The weekend effect: Trading patterns of individual and institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 45(1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328818
Lakonishok, J., & Smidt, S. (1988). Are seasonal anomalies real? A ninety-Year perspective. Review of Financial Studies, 1(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.4.403
Miller, E. M. (1988). Why a weekend effect. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 14(4), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1988.409174
Perry, P. (1985). Portfolio serial correlation and non-Synchronous trading. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 517–523.
Ritter, J. R. (1988). The buying and selling behavior of individual investors at the turn of the year. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04601.x
Rogalski, R. J. (1984). New findings regarding day-of-the-Week returns over trading and non-Trading periods: A note. The Journal of Finance, 39(5), 1603–1614. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327747
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 José García Blandón

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 188
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 579
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 24% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 24%.
Last 2 years: 89 views, 187 downloads.
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. Singapore 16% · United States 16% · China 9%
3.08 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics