Dollarization and economic interdependence: the case of Ecuador

Authors

  • Ramon Amadeo Castillo-Ponce California State University, Los Angeles and Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Brian Truong California State University, Los Angeles image/svg+xml
  • Maria de Lourdes Rodriguez-Espinosa Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702021000100085

Keywords:

Dollarization, Business Cycles Synchronization, Economic Integration, Financial Integration

Abstract

Economic theory suggest that dollarization increases the degree of interdependence between the dollarized economy and the anchor country. We test this theory for the case of the U.S. and Ecuador. We evaluate the existence of common trends and common cycles amongst production variables. The analysis considers data at the aggregate and industry levels. At the aggregate level, the results show that the economies of the U.S. and Ecuador were interrelated prior to dollarization. This interrelation increased after Ecuador adopted the U.S. dollar. At the industry level, we find that synchronization existed between some Ecuadorian industries and the U.S. Gross Domestic Product prior to dollarization. The interdependence increased after dollarization and it is particularly evident for the financial industry. This result is especially important since it shows how the use of a common currency leads to the integration of financial markets in the dollarized economy and economic activity in the anchor country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arellano, C., & Heathcote, J. (2010). Dollarization and financial integration. Journal of Economic Theory, 145(3), 944–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2009.08.002

Berg, A., & Borensztein, E. (2000). The pros and cons of full dollarization (IMF Working Paper N.º WP/00/50). International Monetary Fund.

Beveridge, S., & Nelson, C. (1981). A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(2), 151–174.

Castillo-Ponce, R., & Rodríguez-Espinosa, M. (2009). La dolarización de El Salvador: ¿Una contribución negativa al crecimiento económico? [Dollarization in El Salvador: A negative contribution to economic growth?]. Comercio Exterior, 59(11), 898–909.

Christopoulos, D., & Tsionas, M. (2004). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 55–74.

Erten, B., & Ocampo, J. A. (2015). Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century. World Development, 44, 14–30.

Gale, D., & Vives, X. (2002). Dollarization, bailouts, and the stability of the banking system. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 467–502.

González, A., Micco, A., & Montoya, A. M. (2015). Dollarization, foreign ownership, and competition in the banking industry in Latin America. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(1), 90–107.

Herrera, J. (2004). Business cycles in Mexico and the United States: Do they share common movements? Journal of Applied Economics, 7(2), 303–323.

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580.

Lakić, S., Šehović, D., & Ćetković, J. (2016). An analysis of the official dollarization regime in Montenegro: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of International Studies, 9(2), 48–64.

Lange, C., & Sauer, C. (2005). Dollarization in Latin America: Seigniorage costs and policy implications. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45(4–5), 662–679.

Lindenberg, N., & Westermann, F. (2012). Common trends and common cycles among interest rates of the G7-countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 34(4), 1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.06.006

Marí del Cristo, M., & Gómez-Puig, M. (2016). Fiscal sustainability and dollarization: The case of Ecuador. Applied Economics, 48(23), 2139–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1114580

Musa, M. (1986). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behavior of real exchange rate regimes: Evidence and implications. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 117–214.

Perron, P., & Wada, T. (2009). Let's take a break: Trends and cycles in U.S. real GDP. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(6), 749–765.

Quispe-Agnoli, M., & Whisler, E. (2006). Official dollarization and the banking system in Ecuador and El Salvador. Economic Review, 91(3), 55–71.

Rodríguez, M., & Dombrow, J. (2015). Dollarization and real estate market performance: Evidence from housing in El Salvador. Journal of Housing Research, 24(1), 37–53.

Sandoval, L., Malaga, J., & Carpio, C. (2015). Analysis of the impact of dollarization and CAFTA-DR on El Salvador's trade flows [Ponencia]. Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2015 Annual Meeting.

Soto, R. (2009). Dollarization, economic growth, and unemployment. Economics Letters, 105(1), 42–45.

Vahid, F., & Engle, R. (1993). Common trends and common cycles. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1099-1255.1993.tb00002.x

Yepes, J. (2016). Dollarization and growth: A synthetic control approach to Ecuador and El Salvador's cases [Tesis de maestría, Baylor University].

Downloads

Published

2021-04-06

How to Cite

Castillo-Ponce, R. A., Truong, B., & Rodriguez-Espinosa, M. de L. (2021). Dollarization and economic interdependence: the case of Ecuador. Economic Analysis Review, 36(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702021000100085

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
316
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
746

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 5% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 5%.

Last 2 years: 214 views, 373 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 3 · Crossref 2

2.36 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)