Efficiency In Public Higher Education: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Considering Heterogeneity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702021000200021Keywords:
Universities’ Teaching Efficiency, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, HeterogeneityAbstract
We aim to study technical efficiency of undergraduate teaching activity in national (public) universities in Argentina. We employ a stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) with a panel of 37 national universities over 2005-2013. We compare models that do not account for heterogeneity with heterogeneity-extended SFA models. We find from 18 percent to 25 percent of inefficiency on average in terms of lost outcomes (graduates) depending on the specification, with high dispersion among universities. Models considering heterogeneity report the highest levels of technical efficiency. Besides, the results show evidence of heterogeneity both observed and unobserved. Our estimates are robust to different specifications.Downloads
References
Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(01)00068-1
Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0121(00)00010-0
Battese, G., & Coelli, T. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.
Belotti, F., Daidone, S., Ilardi, G., & Atella, V. (2012). Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata (CEIS Research Paper Series N.º 251, Vol. 10, N.º 1). CEIS Tor Vergata.
Box, G., & Cox, D. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 26, 211–252.
Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (2004). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
Cantele, S., Guerrini, A., & Campedelli, B. (2016). Efficiency of Italian universities: The effect of controllable and non-controllable environmental and operational variables. International Journal of Public Policy, 12(3/4/5/6), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpp.2016.079737
Caudill, S., & Ford, J. (1993). Biases in frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity. Economics Letters, 41(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90104-k
Caudill, S., Ford, J., & Gropper, D. (1995). Frontier estimation and firm-specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524583
Chen, Y., Nixon, M. R., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2010). Research productivity of accounting faculty: An exploratory study. American Journal of Business Education, 3(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v3i2.389
Coria, M. (2011). Eficiencia técnica de las universidades de gestión estatal en Argentina [Technical efficiency of state-run universities in Argentina]. Ensayos de Política Económica, 5, 44–64.
Costa, E., De Sousa Ramos, F., & Ramos de Souza, H. (2011). The productive efficiency of federal institutions of Brazilian higher education [Ponencia]. Encontro ANPEC 2011. http://anpec.org.br/encontro/2011/inscricao/arquivos/000-9450a34ddcb188d30bb486d5d5e1da43.doc
Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., & Simar, L. (2015). Efficiency and economies of scale and specialization in European universities: A directional distance approach. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.002
De Fraja, G., & Valbonesi, P. (2012). The design of the university system. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3-4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.10.005
Ferreyra, M., Avitabile, C., Botero Alvarez, J., Haimovich Paz, F., & Urzua, S. (2017). At a crossroads: Higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean [Informe]. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/271781495774058113/At-a-crossroads-higher-education-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1014-5
Gates, S., & Stone, A. (1997). Understanding productivity in higher education [Informe]. RAND, Institute on Education and Training. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/drafts/2008/DRU1596.pdf
Greene, W. (2005a). Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2), 269–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.003
Greene, W. (2005b). Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1
Greene, W. (2008). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In H. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (pp. 92–250). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183528.003.0002
Hadri, K. (1999). Estimation of a doubly heteroscedastic stochastic frontier cost function. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(3), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1999.10524824
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.
Horne, J., & Hu, B. (2008). Estimation of cost efficiency of Australian universities. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 78(2-3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.018
Ibañez Martin, M., Morresi, S., & Delbianco, F. (2017). Una medición de la eficiencia interna en una universidad argentina usando el método de fronteras estocásticas [A measurement of internal efficiency in an Argentine university using the stochastic frontier method]. Revista de Educación Superior, 46(183), 47–62.
Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(2), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042095
Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). Higher education institutions' costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.02.001
Johnes, J. (2006a). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005
Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 443–456.
Johnes, J. (2008). Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2004/05. Manchester School, 76(6), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01087.x
Johnes, J., & Yu, L. (2008). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Economic Review, 19(4), 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004
Jondrow, J., Lovell, C., Materov, I., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5
Kao, C., & Hung, H. (2008). Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study. Omega, 36(4), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.003
Katharaki, M., & Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment for Greek universities' efficiency using quantitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4-5), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2010.11.001
Kuah, C., & Wong, K. (2011). Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.084
Kumbhakar, S., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1993). Technical efficiency and technical progress in Swedish dairy farms. In H. Fried, K. Lovell, & S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 256–270). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195072181.003.0009
Kuo, J., & Ho, Y. (2008). The cost efficiency impact of the university operation fund in Taiwan. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.06.003
Laureti, T., Secondi, L., & Biggeri, L. (2014). Measuring the efficiency of teaching activities in Italian universities: An information theoretic approach. Economics of Education Review, 42(C), 147–164.
Lee, B., & Worthington, A. (2016). A network DEA quantity and quality-oriented production model: An application to Australian university research services. Omega, 60, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.014
McGuckin, R., & Winkler, D. (1979). University resources in the production of education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924592
Mensah, Y., & Werner, R. (2003). Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-4254(03)00036-x
Millot, B. (2015). International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 156–165.
Pitt, M., & Lee, L. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3
Quiroga-Martínez, F., Fernández-Vázquez, E., & Alberto, C. L. (2018). Efficiency in public higher education on Argentina 2004–2013: Institutional decisions and university-specific effects. Latin American Economic Review, 27(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-018-0062-0
Salerno, C. (2003). What we know about the efficiency of higher education institutions: The best evidence [Informe]. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5185095/bhw-99-bgo99.pdf
Sav, G. (2012). Managing operating efficiencies of publicly owned universities: American university stochastic frontier estimates using panel data. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 2(1), 1–23.
Schmidt, P., & Lin, T. (1984). Simple tests of alternative specifications in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Econometrics, 24(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90058-7
Secretaría de Políticas Universitarias. (s. f.). Anuarios de estadísticas universitarias [Yearbooks of university statistics]. Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Argentina. http://portales.educacion.gov.ar/spu/investigacion-y-estadisticas/anuarios/
Stata. (2019). Base reference manual: Release 16. Stata Press.
Wolff, E., Baumol, W., & Noyes Saini, A. (2014). A comparative analysis of education costs and outcomes: The United States vs. other OECD countries. Economics of Education Review, 39, 1–21.
Worthington, A. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290110086126
Worthington, A., & Lee, B. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003. Economics of Education Review, 27, 285–298.
Zoghbi, A., Rocha, F., & Mattos, E. (2013). Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian universities. Economic Modelling, 31, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vanesa D'Elia, Gustavo Ferro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 175
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 538
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 8% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 8%.
Last 2 years: 143 views, 383 downloads.
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. United States 19% · Singapore 12% · China 9%
3.07 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
