Economic Impact of the Open Skies Agreements Policy in Chile

Authors

Keywords:

liberalization, air transport, open skies policies, bilateral agreements, Chile

Abstract

In 1979, the “Ley de Aviación Comercial” (Commercial Aviation Act) was passed in Chile. Its main goal was to improve the air transport by means of “Open Sky Policies”, competence (freedom of prices) and a progressive lesser intervention of the official authority. Since then an international air policy is applied under the frame of “Open Skyes with Reciprocity”. This article evaluates economically the impact of the Chilean liberalization policy in this market during the last years. Specifically, we evaluated the impacts of the Agreements on Open Skyes that Chile has reached with the most important countries in terms of air traffic. Besides that, a comparison is made with other countries in the region with lower levels of economic openness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agostini, C. (2005). El mercado de transporte aéreo: Lecciones para Chile de una revisión de la literatura. Documento de Investigación I-163 ILADES/Georgetown University. http://www.economia. uahurtado.cl/pdf/publicaciones/inv163.pdf.

Betancor, O., & Rendeiro, R. (1999). Regulating privatized infrastructures and airport services. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2180, The World Bank. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/ servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/10/07/000094946_99092312481856/Rendered/PDF/ multi_page.pdf.

Breinlich, H. (2006). Trade liberalization and industrial restructuring through mergers and acquisitions. Economics Discussion Papers 619, University of Essex.

Brueckner, J. K., & Whalen, W. T. (2000). The price effects of international airline alliances. The Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 503–546. https://doi.org/10.1086/467464

Button, K. (2002). Toward truly open skies. Regulation, 12-16 (Fall).

Button, K., & Taylor, S. (2000). International air transportation and economic development. Journal of Air Transportation, 6(4), 209–222.

Caceres, A., Quintana, E., & Pierola, M. (2000). Situación y perspectivas del mercado aerocomercial peruano. Documento de Trabajo Nº 012-2000, Area de Estudios Económicos del INDECOPI.

Fischer, R. (2008). Política comercial estratégica en el mercado aéreo chileno. Documento de Trabajo CEA Nº 246, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Chile.

Forsyth, P. (2001). Tourism benefits and aviation policy. Journal of Air Transport Management, 7(1), 3–13.

Gillen, D., & Hinsch, H. (2001). Measuring the economic impact of liberalization of international aviation on hamburg airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 7(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-6997(00)00025-9

Micco, A., & Serebrisky, T. (2006). Competition regimes and air transport costs: The effects of open skies agreements. Journal of International Economics, 70(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.015

Shane, J. N. (2004). 12th annual international CEO conference. Hollywood, Florida. http://ostpxweb. dot.gov/S-3/Data/LatAmAirlineCEOConf%20(5-4-04).pdf.

Shane, J. N. (2005). Liberalization: More important than ever. 13th Annual International CEO Conference. Miami, Florida. http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/S-3/Data/International%20CEO%20Conf%20 (5-9-05).pdf.

Whalen, W. T. (2007). A panel data analysis of code-sharing, antitrust immunity, and open skies treaties in international aviation markets. Review of Industrial Organization, 30(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9125-0

Published

2008-04-30

How to Cite

Villena, M. J., Harrison, R., & Villena, M. G. (2008). Economic Impact of the Open Skies Agreements Policy in Chile. Economic Analysis Review, 23(1), 197–149. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/78

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
151
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
345

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 63 views, 132 downloads.

2.28 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics