A Comparative Analysis of the Magellanic Economy from an Input-Output Perspective

Authors

Keywords:

structural analysis, structural similarities, key sectors, production linkages, input-output tables

Abstract

This paper detects structural similarities among several regions in Chile, in particular those that can be compared to the Magellanic and the Chilean Antarctica region: the regions Tarapacá, Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins Riquelme, Bío- Bío and Los Lagos. This exercise is particularly relevant given the economic characteristics and geographic location of all of them. This comparison would allow less advantaged regions to learn from the most successful ones. Policy makers would be able to evaluate ex-ante different policies, helping in this way the decision making process. To this end, in this paper we follow two approaches: first, we find similarities among regions using Le Masne’s (1988) indicator; second, we use one in which the similarities are identified thru the productive links, following the methodologies of Rasmussen (1956), Dietzenbacher and van der Linden (1997) and Soza (2007b). Once we determine which technique is better for our problem, a hierarchical cluster is applied to obtain groups of regions based on the relationship they form. It is of particular interest to identify those sectors that have the largest impact on development and analyze its productive linkages. The analysis is done using the 1996 input-output charts developed by National Institute of Statistics (INE) and the Ministry of Planning and Development (MIDEPLAN).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cella, G. (1986). THE INPUT‐OUTPUT MEASUREMENT OF INTERINDUSTRY LINKAGES: A REPLY. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(4), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48004006.x

Chenery, H., & Watanabe, T. (1958). An international comparison of the structure of production. Econometrica, 26(4).

Dietzenbacher, E., & Van der Linden, J. A. (1997). Sectoral and spatial linkages in the EC production structure. Journal of Regional Science, 37(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00053

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2000). Análisis multivariante. quinta edición, Ed. Prentice Hall, Madrid.

Hazari, B. R. (1970). Empirical identification of key sectors in the Indian economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926298

Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven, Yale University Press, Connecticut, USA.

Le Masne, P. (1988). Le système productif français face a ses voisins européens. Troisième Colloque de Comptabilité Nacionale, París.

Pulido, A., & Fontela, E. (1993). Análisis input-Output. Modelos datos y aplicaciones. Editorial Pirámide, España.

Sonis, M., Guilhoto, J., Hewwings, G., & Martins, E. (1995). Key sectors, and structural change: Some new perspectives. The Developing Economics, 33(3), 233–270.

Soza, S. (2008). Interrelaciones sectoriales en magallanes: En busca de su estructura económica. Magallania, 36(1).

Published

2008-10-31

How to Cite

Soza Amigo, S. (2008). A Comparative Analysis of the Magellanic Economy from an Input-Output Perspective. Economic Analysis Review, 23(2), 95–120. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/82

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
247
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
537

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 51 views, 122 downloads.

2.17 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics