A Copula and Extreme-Value Based Methodology for Estimating the Required Economic Capital in a Retail-Credit Portfolio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702009000200004Keywords:
Economic capital, credit risk, copulas, extreme value theoryAbstract
This paper poses a new methodology to estimate the required economic capital for a retail-credit portfolio. The methodology is based on both the general copula concepts and some core results from the extreme value theory (EVT). The main results support the fact that the proposed methodology is more flexible than other traditional techniques, in particular when it makes use of elliptical generalized or grouped t Student copulas to model the dependence structure of risk-parameters or when it includes elements of the EVT to analyze the extreme losses behavior of a retail-credit portfolio. When applying algorithms, the paper includes data from a Mexican bank.Downloads
References
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2005). An explanatory note on the Basel II IRB risk weight functions. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. http://www.bis.org/bcbs/irbriskweight.htm
Biggs, D., De Ville, B., & Suen, E. (1991). A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 18(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769100000005
Bouye, E., Durrleman, V., Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G., & Roncalli, T. (2000). Copulas for finance: A reading guide and some applications. Financial Econometrics Research Centre, CUBSL.
Chan-Lau, J. (2008). Default risk codependence in the global financial system: Was the Bear Stearns bailout justified? Banco Central de Chile. http://www.bcentral.cl/conferencias-seminarios/seminarios/index.htm. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439818541-c23
Crosbie, P., & Bohn, J. (2002). Modelling default risk. KMV.
Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2000). A comparative analysis of current credit risk models. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(1-2), 59–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(99)00053-9
De Andrade, F., & Thomas, L. (2004). Structural models in consumer credit (Risk and Insurance Working Paper N.º 0407001). EconWPA.
Demarta, S., & McNeil, A. (2004). The t copula and related copulas. International Statistical Review, 73(1), 111–129.
Díaz, A. (2003). Teoría de valores extremos para sucesiones de variables aleatorias dependientes [Extreme value theory for sequences of dependent random variables] [Tesis de licenciatura]. UNAM.
Diks, C., van Zwet, W. R., Takens, F., & Degoede, J. (1996). Detecting differences between delay vector distributions. Physical Review E, 53(3), 2169–2176. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.53.2169
Dowd, K. (2000). Assessing VaR accuracy. Derivatives Quarterly, 6(3), 61–63.
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2
Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., & Straumann, D. (2002). Correlation and dependency in risk management: Properties and pitfalls. In M. Dempster (Ed.), Risk management: Value at risk and beyond (pp. 176–223). Cambridge University Press.
Frahm, G., & Junker, M. (2003). Generalized elliptical distributions: Models and estimation. Research Center Caesar Financial Engineering.
Frey, R., & McNeil, A. (2003). Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk. Journal of Risk, 6(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2003.089
Hult, H., & Lindskog, F. (2001). Multivariate extremes, aggregation and dependence in elliptical distribution. RiskLab.
Kole, E., Koedijk, K., & Verbeek, M. (2005). Testing copulas to model financial dependence. RSM Erasmus University.
Kostadinov, K. (2005). Non-parametric estimation of elliptical copulae with application to credit risk. Munich University of Technology.
Márquez, J. (2006). Una nueva visión del riesgo de crédito [A new vision of credit risk]. Limusa.
Márquez, J., & López, F. (2006). Un modelo de riesgo de crédito y su aplicación para realizar una prueba de estrés del sistema financiero mexicano [A credit risk model and its application to conduct a stress test of the Mexican financial system]. Estabilidad Financiera, 10, 25–54.
Matten, C. (2000). Managing bank capital: Capital allocation and performance measurement. John Wiley & Sons.
Panchenko, V. (2005). Goodness of fit test for copulas. Physica A, 355(1), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.081
Perli, R., & Nayda, W. (2004). Economic and regulatory capital allocation for revolving retail exposures. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(4), 789–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(03)00200-0
Ramírez, J. C. (2004). Usos y limitaciones de los procesos estocásticos en el tratamiento de distribuciones de rendimientos con colas gordas [Uses and limitations of stochastic processes in the treatment of fat-tailed return distributions]. Revista de Análisis Económico, 19(1), 51–76.
RMA Capital Working Group. (2003). Economic capital estimation: Best practices in retail credit. The RMA Journal, 85(7), 68–69.
Saita, F. (2007). Value at risk and bank capital management (Academic Press Advanced Finance Series). Elsevier.
Segoviano, M., & Goodhart, C. (2009). Banking stability measures (Working Paper N.º 09/4). International Monetary Fund.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Adan Diaz Hernandez, Jose Carlos Ramirez Sanchez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 211
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 185
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 54 views, 78 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 1 · Crossref 1
0.88 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
