Fixed Costs and Asset Market Participation
Keywords:
fixed costs, asset market participation, heterogeneous agents, competitive equilibrium, risk-free rate puzzle, portfolio choiceAbstract
This paper investigates the effects of fixed costs on investor's decision of asset market participation. The model features a continuum of agents with heterogeneous initial wealth and attitude toward risk. We show that under certain conditions there exists a unique competitive equilibrium in which investors optimally choose to stay in autarky, participate just in the riskless asset market or in both the riskless and the risky asset markets. The model is calibrated based on earnings profile from the U.S. We find that using fixed costs that are comparable to the current commission charged by brokers the model can generate participation patterns similar to observed ones. Further, we find participation rates to be very sensitive to the costs differentials associated with entering the risky asset market while relatively less sensitive to the overall levels of fixed costs. Finally, we find that costs make it even harder for dynamic models to replicate the risk free rate and in that sense deepen that puzzle.Downloads
References
Abowd, J., & Card, D. (1989). On the covariance structure of earnings and hours changes. Econometrica, 57(2), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912561
Allen, F., & Gale, D. (1994). Limited market participation and volatility of asset prices. American Economic Review, 84(4), 933–955.
Brennan, M. (1975). The optimal number of securities in a risky asset portfolio when there are fixed costs of transacting: They and some empirical results. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10(3), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330492
Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1992). Earnings and wage distributions in the NLS, CPS, and PSID [Manuscrito]. Boston College y Brown University y NBER.
Grossman, S., & Laroque, G. (1990). Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the presence of illiquid durable consumption goods. Econometrica, 58(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938333
Haliassos, M., & Bertaut, C. (1995). Why do so few hold stocks? The Economic Journal, 105(432), 1110–1129.
Heaton, J., & Lucas, D. (1996). Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets for risk sharing and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 104(3), 443–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/262030
Jeffrey, N. A. (1995, 3 de febrero). Delving into the depths of deep discounters. Wall Street Journal.
Karoly, L. (1990). The trend in inequality among families, individuals, and workers in the United States: A twenty five year perspective [Manuscrito no publicado]. Rand Corporation.
King, M., & Leape, J. (1984). Wealth and portfolio composition: Theory and evidence (NBER Working Paper N.º 1468). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mankiw, G., & Zeldes, S. (1991). The consumption of stockholders and non-stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1), 97–112.
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145–161.
MuCurdy, T. (1982). The use of time series processes to model the error structure of earnings in longitudinal data analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 83–114.
Weil, P. (1989). The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90028-7
Williamson, S. (1994). Liquidity and market participation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(3-4), 629–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90026-4
Zeldes, S. (1989). Consumption and liquidity constraints: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 97(2), 305–346. https://doi.org/10.1086/261605
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Amir Yaron, Harold H. Zhang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 217
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 224
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 76 views, 104 downloads.
1.03 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics