Marginal Cost of Public Funds and Regulatory Regimes: Computable General Equilibrium Evaluation for Argentina

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702010000100004

Keywords:

Marginal cost public funds, regulation, general equilibrium, Argentina

Abstract

We estimate the Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Argentina using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model, assessing the sensitivity of the results to the existence of alternative regulatory regimes (price-cap and cost-plus) for public utilities subject to regulation. The estimates are in the range of international studies, and we confirm that the results are sensitive to the regulatory regime, to the presence of exempted goods, the existence of unemployment, the elasticity of labor supply, as well as to the degree of capital mobility, between sectors and internationally. In addition, our results highlight the existence of differential propensity to finance public projects under price-cap regimes vis-à-vis cost-plus regimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866403

Atkinson, A. B., & Stern, N. H. (1974). Pigou, taxation and public goods. The Review of Economic Studies, 41(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296403

Ballard, L. C., & Fullerton, D. (1992). Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.3.117

Breton, A. (1996). Competitive government. Cambridge University Press.

Browning, E. K. (1976). The marginal cost of public funds. Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/260432

Browning, E. K. (1987). On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. The American Economic Review, 77(1), 11–23.

Chisari, O. O., Estache, A., Lambardi, G., & Romero, C. (2003). Trade performance and regulatory regimes [Conference presentation]. Meeting of Asociación Argentina de Economía Política and LACEA, Puebla.

Chisari, O. O., Estache, A., & Romero, C. (1999). Winners and losers of utility privatization and regulation in Argentina. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 357–378.

Chisari, O. O., Romero, C., Ferro, G., Theller, R., Cicowiez, M., Ferraro, J., González, M., Blanco, A., & Maquieyra, J. (2009). Un modelo de equilibrio general computable para la Argentina [A computable general equilibrium model for Argentina]. PNUD-Argentina.

Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, M. (2004). Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives (NBER Working Paper N.º 10471). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Feldstein, M. (1997). How big should the government be? (NBER Working Paper N.º 5868). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ginsburgh, V., & Keyzer, M. (1997). The structure of applied general equilibrium models. MIT Press.

Harberger, A. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1086/258636

Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press.

Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. McGraw-Hill.

Pigou, A. (1928). A study in public finance. Macmillan.

Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1973). A general equilibrium calculation of the effects of differential taxation of income from capital in the U.S. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 281–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90009-6

Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of public sector. W. W. Norton.

Stiglitz, J. E., & Dasgupta, P. S. (1971). Differential taxation, public goods, and economic efficiency. The Review of Economic Studies, 38(2), 151–174.

Warlters, M., & Auriol, E. (2005). The marginal cost of public funds in Africa (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper N.º 3679). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3679

Downloads

Published

2010-08-12

How to Cite

Chisari, O. O., & Cicowiez, M. (2010). Marginal Cost of Public Funds and Regulatory Regimes: Computable General Equilibrium Evaluation for Argentina. Economic Analysis Review, 25(1), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702010000100004

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
321
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
585

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 14% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 14%.

Last 2 years: 112 views, 179 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 5 · Crossref 0

1.82 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics