Testing the Validity of Wagner’s Law in Bolivia: A Cointegration and Causality Analysis with Disaggregated Data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000100002

Keywords:

Wagner law, unit roots, cointegration, Error Correction models

Abstract

Nine versions of Wagner’s law are examined employing annual time-series data on Bolivia for the period 1940-2010. The analysis is an advance over previous work in several ways. First, the stationarity properties and the order of integration of the data are investigated using the Augmented Dickey-Fuller and the Phillips and Perron tests. Second, the hypothesis of a long-run relationship between different types of government expenditures and income is tested employing the methodology of cointegration analysis. Third, Error Correction Models are utilized to determine the direction of causality between the variables of interest. Lastly, the study comprises a period of seventy years, the longest of its kind for Bolivia. Consistent with Wagner’s proposition, bidirectional causality is found between income and government expenditures in six of the nine versions of the law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abizadeh, S., & Gray, J. (1985). Wagner's law: A pooled time-series cross-section comparison. National Tax Journal, 88(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/ntj41792010

Afxentiou, P. C., & Serletis, A. (1991). A time-series analysis of the relationship between government expenditure and GDP in Canada. Public Finance Quarterly, 19(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219101900303

Afxentiou, P. C., & Serletis, A. (1996). Government expenditures in the European Union: Do they converge or follow Wagner's law? International Economic Journal, 10, 33–47.

Afzal, M., & Abbas, Q. (2010). Wagner's law in Pakistan: Another look. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(1), 12–19.

Ahsan, S., Kwan, A., & Sahni, B. (1996). Cointegration and Wagner's hypothesis: Time series evidence for Canada. Applied Economics, 28(8), 1055–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368496328182

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1974.1100705

Akitoby, B., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Inchauste, G. (2006). Public spending, voracity and Wagner's law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.001

Ansari, M. I., Gordon, D. V., & Akuamoah, C. (1997). Keynes versus Wagner: Public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Applied Economics, 29(4), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497327038

Ashworth, J. (1994). Spurious in Mexico: A comment on Wagner's law. Public Finance, 49(2), 282–286.

Asseery, A., Law, D., & Perdikis, N. (1999). Wagner's law and public expenditure in Iraq: A test using disaggregated data. Applied Economics Letters, 6(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048599353852

Biswal, B., Dhawan, U., & Lee, H.-Y. (1999). Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada. Applied Economics, 31(10), 1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499323490

Chang, T., Liu, W., & Caudill, S. B. (2004). A re-examination of Wagner's law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Applied Financial Economics, 14(8), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000233872

Chletsos, M., & Kollias, C. (1997). Testing Wagner's law using disaggregated public expenditure data in the case of Greece: 1958–93. Applied Economics, 29(3), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497327155

Diamond, J. (1977). Wagner's "law" and the developing countries. The Developing Economies, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1977.tb00369.x

Dickey, D. A., Bell, W., & Miller, R. (1986). Unit roots in time series models: Tests and implications. The American Statistician, 40(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475349

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error-correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

Engle, R. F., & Yoo, B. (1987). Forecasting and testing in cointegrated systems. Journal of Econometrics, 35, 143–159.

Florio, M., & Colautti, S. (2005). A logistic growth theory of public expenditures: A study of five countries over 100 years. Public Choice, 122(3-4), 355–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3900-y

Gandhi, V. P. (1971). Wagner's law of public expenditure: Do recent cross-section studies confirm it? Public Finance, 26, 44–56.

Granger, C. W. (1986). Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003002.x

Granger, C. W., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7

Halicioglu, F. (2003). Testing Wagner's law for Turkey, 1960–2000. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 1(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.2202/1475-3693.1007

Hayo, B. (1994). No further evidence of Wagner's law for Mexico. Public Finance, 49(2), 287–294.

Hondroyiannis, G., & Papapetrou, E. (1995). An examination of Wagner's law for Greece: A cointegration analysis. Public Finance, 50, 67–79.

Hsiao, C. (1979a). Autoregressive modeling of Canadian money and income data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(367), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10481651

Hsiao, C. (1979b). Causality tests in econometrics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 4(4), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1889(79)90194-5

Hsiao, C. (1981). Autoregressive modeling and money-income causality detection. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 85–106.

Iyare, S., & Lorde, T. (2004). Cointegration, causality and Wagner's law: Tests for selected Caribbean countries. Applied Economics Letters, 11(13), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485042000254881

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3

Johansen, S. (1994). Testing weak exogeneity and the order of cointegration in UK money demand data. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14, 313–334.

Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 1(1-3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y

Lin, C.-A. (1995). More evidence on Wagner's law for Mexico. Public Finance, 50(2), 262–277.

MacKinnon, J. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests in long-run economic relationships. In R. Engle & C. Granger (Eds.), Readings in cointegration (pp. 267–276). Oxford University Press.

Magazzino, C. (2010). Wagner's law and Italian disaggregated public spending: Some empirical evidences (MPRA Paper No. 26662). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Mann, A. J. (1980). Wagner's law: An econometric test for Mexico. National Tax Journal, 33(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/ntj41862301

Murthy, V. (1993). Further evidence of Wagner's law for Mexico: An application of cointegration analysis. Public Finance, 48(1), 92–96.

Nagarajan, P., & Spears, A. (1990). An econometric test of Wagner's law for Mexico: A reexamination. Public Finance, 1, 165–168.

Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I., & Smyth, R. (2008). Panel data, cointegration, causality and Wagner's law: Empirical evidence from Chinese provinces. China Economic Review, 19(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.004

Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335

Ram, R. (1986). Causality between income and government expenditure: A broad international perspective. Public Finance, 3, 393–413.

Rehman, J., Iqbal, A., & Siddiqi, W. (2010). Cointegration-causality analysis between public expenditures and economic growth in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), 556–565.

Tano, D. K. (1993). The added worker effect: A causality test. Economics Letters, 43(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90142-y

Thornton, J. (1999). Cointegration, causality and Wagner's law in nineteenth century Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 6(7), 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048599352916

Tobin, D. (2005). Economic liberalization, the changing role of the state and Wagner's law: China's development since 1978. World Development, 33(5), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.12.001

Vatter, H. G., & Walker, J. F. (1986). Real public sector employment growth, Wagner's law, and economic growth in the United States. Public Finance, 1, 117–137.

Wagner, A. (1883). Grundlegung der politischen Ökonomie [Foundations of political economy] (3.ª ed.). C. F. Winter.

Yousefi, M., & Abizadeh, S. (1992). Growth of state government expenditures: Empirical evidence from the United States. Public Finance, 47(2), 322–239.

Zheng, Y., Li, J., Wang, X.-L., & Li, C. (2010). An empirical analysis of the validity of Wagner's law in China: A case study based on Gibbs sampler. International Journal of Business Management, 5(6), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n6p161

Downloads

Published

2013-04-23

How to Cite

Bojanic, A. N. (2013). Testing the Validity of Wagner’s Law in Bolivia: A Cointegration and Causality Analysis with Disaggregated Data. Economic Analysis Review, 28(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000100002

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
266
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
398

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 11% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 11%.

Last 2 years: 126 views, 196 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 20 · Crossref 6

Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. Singapore 19% · Poland 14% · Chile 11%

1.50 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics