Extreme wealth and economic development with special emphasis on Mexico and China

Authors

  • Ana Lilia Valderrama Santibañez Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Superior de Economía Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación
  • Hector Flores Márquez Facultad de Economía de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla image/svg+xml
  • Omar Neme Castillo Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Superior de Economía Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702023000200101

Keywords:

Extreme Wealth, Human Development Index, Democracy, Economic Freedom

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to determine the effect of extreme wealth on economic development (human development index and sub-indices) in 64 countries during 2005-2018, with special emphasis on Mexico and China. A dynamic estimation (sys-GMM) is followed. Estimations show that extreme national wealth acts as a constraint on human development for the entire sample of countries, including Mexico and China. Income is found to be most sensitive to this type of wealth, followed by the education index. The analysis confirms that democracy, economic freedom, investment and social spending are underlying factors of HDI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2008). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency (Working Paper N.º 861). European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp861.pdf

Agarwal, P. (2015). Social sector expenditure and human development: Empirical analysis of Indian states. Indian Journal of Human Development, 9(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020150202

Akobeng, E. (2017). Gross capital formation, institutions and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(2), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1128833

Alonso, C., & Arellano, M. (1996). Symmetrically normalized instrumental variable estimation using panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(1), 36–49.

Anderson, J. (2010). Effects of increased trade and investment on human development in the US and Mexican border communities. The Journal of Developing Areas, 43(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.0.0055

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d

Ashby, N., Bueno, A., & Martinez, D. (2013). Economic freedom and economic development in the Mexican states. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 43(1), 21–33.

Bagi, S. (2019). Democracy and human well-being. Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association, 4(1), 29–32.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800475

Brezis, E., & Hellier, J. (2013). Social mobility at the top: Why are elites self-reproducing? (Working Paper N.º 2013-312). ECINEQ.

Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper N.º 163). OECD.

Dahl, R. (2015). On democracy. Yale University Press.

Donald, K. (2018). La creciente concentración de la riqueza y el poder económico son un obstáculo para el desarrollo sostenible: ¿Qué hacer? [The growing concentration of wealth and economic power is an obstacle to sustainable development: What to do?]. Global Policy Watch, Global Policy Forum. https://www.globalpolicywatch.org/esp/?p=595

Edeme, R. (2014). Analyzing the effects of sectoral public spending on human development in Nigeria: Evidence from panel data. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(9), 1–13.

Fadilah, A., Fajri, C., & Kaluge, D. (2018). A panel approach: How does government expenditure influence human development index? Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 10(2), 130–139.

Faria, H., & Montesinos, H. (2009). Does economic freedom cause prosperity? An IV approach. Public Choice, 141(1-2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9440-0

Freund, C., & Oliver, S. (2016). Rich people poor countries: The rise of emerging tycoons and their firms. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Graafland, J. (2019). Contingencies in the relationship between economic freedom and human development: The role of generalized trust. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137419000705

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, D. (2015). Extreme wealth is no merited (OXFAM Discussion Paper). OXFAM.

Johansson, A. (2016). Public finance, economic growth, and inequality: A survey of the evidence. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.

Johnston, M. (2009). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Kamar, K. (2017). The effect of aggregate expenditure on gross regional domestic product and its impact on HDI, labor absorption and poverty in Tangerang Regency. Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0802022537

Keeley, B. (2015). Income inequality: The gap between rich and poor. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246010-en

Killewald, A., Pfeffer, F., & Schachne, J. (2017). Wealth inequality and accumulation. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 379–404.

Korom, P., Lutter, M., & Beckert, J. (2017). The enduring importance of family wealth: Evidence from the Forbes 400, 1982 to 2013. Social Science Research, 65, 75–95.

Liotti, G., Musella, M., & D’Isanto, F. (2018). Does democracy improve human development? Evidence from former socialist countries. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 9(2), 69–87.

Mahtaney, P. (2013). Globalization and sustainable economic development. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137024992

Mdingi, K., & Ho, S. (2021). Literature review on income inequality and economic growth. MethodsX, 8, 1–12.

Meyer, D., & Sanusi, K. (2019). A causality analysis of the relationships between gross fixed capital formation, economic growth and employment in South Africa. Sciendo, 64(1), 33–44.

Mikusova, B., Nemec, J., Murray, M., & Pischlo, V. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between the size and structure of public expenditure and socio-economic development. Ekonomicky Casopis, 65(4), 320–333.

Moulds, J. (2019). These are the world’s least -and most- corrupt countries. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/least-corrupt-countries-transparency-international-2018

Naanwaab, C. (2018). Does economic freedom promote human development? New evidence from a cross-national study. Journal of Developing Areas, 52(3), 183–198.

ONU. (2015b). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible [Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development]. ONU. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ares70d1_es.pdf

OXFAM. (2013). The cost of inequality: How wealth and income extremes hurt us all. OXFAM. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/266321/mb-cost-of-inequality-180113-en.pdf

OXFAM. (2014). Even it up: Time to end extreme inequality. OXFAM. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/333012/cr-even-it-up-extreme-inequality-291014-en.pdf

Pignataro, A. (2018). Análisis de datos de panel en ciencia política: Ventajas y aplicaciones en estudios electorales [Panel data analysis in political science: Advantages and applications in electoral studies]. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, (46), 259–283.

Piketty, T. (2015). A historical approach to property, inequality and debt: Reflections on Capital in the 21st century. CESifo Forum, 16(1), 40–49.

Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2012). A theory of optimal capital taxation (NBER Working Paper N.º 17989). National Bureau of Economic Research.

PNUD. (2019). Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.

Purje, H., & Nilsson, E. (2015). Extreme poverty and extreme wealth (KEPA Policy Brief N.º 19). KEPA.

Robeyns, I. (2019). What, if anything, is wrong with extreme wealth? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(3), 251–266.

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106

Saha, S., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Democracy-growth nexus and its interaction effect on human development: A cross-national analysis. Economic Modelling, 63, 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.021

Scheuer, F., & Slemrod, J. (2021). Taxing our wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.207

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Stadler, J., Mathews, J., Spellacy, M., & Widrig, M. (2015). Billionaires. PwC.

Sulistyowati, N., Marulitua, B., & Novindra, N. (2017). Impacts of government and household expenditure on HDI. Journal of Economics and Policy, 10(2), 412–428.

Sussman, L., Dubofsky, D., Levitan, A., & Swidan, H. (2014). Good rich, bad rich: Perceptions about the extremely wealthy and their sources of wealth. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(8), 44–57.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin.

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Valderrama Santibañez, A. L., Flores Márquez, H., & Neme Castillo, O. (2023). Extreme wealth and economic development with special emphasis on Mexico and China. Economic Analysis Review, 38(2), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702023000200101

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
94
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
83

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 67 views, 61 downloads.

0.88 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics