Urban Parks: Assessing Non-Market Environmental Values and Policy Strategies for Sustainable Urban Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702025000100111Keywords:
Samanes park, economic value, developing countriesAbstract
Samanes Park is the largest urban park in Ecuador and the third in Latin America. The park is one of the country’s protected areas, home to many native and wild species and a recreation space for local and foreign tourists. On the other hand, being a non-excludable non-rival good, Samanes Park is a public good. Many public goods do not have a market; consequently, they cannot be priced. The problem with the above is that they are not incorporated into decision-making, leading to their deterioration over time; Samanes Park is an example of the above. However, the population demands this type of goods, and its value is reflected in the consumer surplus. Non-market valuation aims to estimate the consumer surplus of public goods. This surplus can be used as a reference for public policy projects that aim to preserve the resource. This research applies the travel cost method (indirect valuation method) to estimate the consumer surplus of site visitors. The consumer surplus was estimated at US$4.50 per visit (per individual).
Downloads
References
Alves, B., Ballester, R., Rigall-i-Torrent, R., Ferreira, O., & Benavente, J. (2017). How feasible is coastal management? A social benefit analysis of a coastal destination in SW Spain. Tourism Management, 60, 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.004
Ambiente. (2014). Guía de parques [Parks guide]. http://areasprotegidas.ambiente.gob.ec/sites/default/files/GUIA_PARQUES_18-2014.pdf
Ariza, E., Ballester, R., Rigall-i-Torrent, R., Salo, A., Roca, E., Villares, M., . . . Sardá, R. (2012). On the relationship between quality, users' perception and economic valuation in NW Mediterranean beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management, 63, 55–66.
Bateman, I., et al. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Department for Transport.
Bertram, C., & Larondelle, N. (2017). Going to the woods is going home: Recreational benefits of a larger urban forest site—A travel cost analysis for Berlin, Germany. Ecological Economics, 132, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.017
Carvache-Franco, M., Carvache-Franco, W., Arce Bastidas, R., & Proaño Moreira, J. L. (2018). Analysis of the motivations and satisfaction towards ecotourism in a national recreation area: The Samanes Park in Guayaquil - Ecuador. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(4), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v9.4(28).07
Castaño-Isaza, J., Newball, R., Roach, B., & Lau, W. W. Y. (2015). Valuing beaches to develop payment for ecosystem services schemes in Colombia's Seaflower marine protected area. Ecosystem Services, 11, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.003
Chae, D. R., Wattage, P., & Pascoe, S. (2012). Recreational benefits from a marine protected area: A travel cost analysis of Lundy. Tourism Management, 33(4), 971–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.10.008
Chan, C. S., Si, F. H., & Marafa, L. M. (2018). Indicator development for sustainable urban park management in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.025
En Guayaquil. (2019). Parque Samanes [Samanes Park]. https://enguayaquil.com/parque-samanes/
Hanauer, M. M., & Reid, J. (2017). Valuing urban open space using the travel-cost method and the implications of measurement error. Journal of Environmental Management, 198, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.005
INEC. (2010). Censo de población y vivienda [Population and housing census]. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/censo-de-poblacion-y-vivienda/
Lamsal, P., Atreya, K., Pant, K. P., & Kumar, L. (2016). Tourism and wetland conservation: Application of travel cost and willingness to pay an entry fee at Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, Nepal. Natural Resources Forum, 40(1-2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12089
Long, J., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). Stata Press.
Mayer, M., & Woltering, M. (2018). Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany's national parks using travel cost models. Ecosystem Services, 31, 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009
Mendelsohn, R., & Olmstead, S. (2009). The economic valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities: Methods and applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-011509-135201
Menendez-Carbo, S., Ruano, M. A., & Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A. (2020). The economic value of Malecón 2000 in Guayaquil, Ecuador: An application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management Perspectives, 36, 100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100727
Rathnayake, R. M. W. (2016). Economic values for recreational planning at Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka. Tourism Geographies, 18(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1136350
Siderelis, C., & Moore, R. (2000). Incorporating users' perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949924
Thompson, C. W., Roe, J., Aspinall, P., Mitchell, R., Clow, A., & Miller, D. (2012). More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
Voke, M., Fairley, I., Willis, M., & Masters, I. (2013). Economic evaluation of the recreational value of the coastal environment in a marine renewables deployment area. Ocean & Coastal Management, 78, 77–87.
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A. (2024). Trust, corruption, and willingness to pay for improved environmental goods: An experimental analysis from a developing country. Social Science Quarterly, 105(3), 709–725.
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., & Ruano, M. A. (2019). Does environmental noise affect housing rental prices in developing countries? Evidence from Ecuador. Land Use Policy, 87, 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104059
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., Ruano, M. A., Silva, C. A., Campoverde, R., Rosero, C., & Sanchez-Loor, D. A. (2023). Dynamism of the housing rental market in Guayaquil, Ecuador: An empirical analysis. Empirical Economics, 64(2), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02271-z
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., Silva-Zambrano, C. A., & Ruano, M. A. (2018). The economic value of natural protected areas in Ecuador: A case of Villamil Beach National Recreation Area. Ocean and Coastal Management, 157, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.020
Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., & Tarupi-Montenegro, E. (2024). Citizens' cultural values and urban green spaces in Colombia: An experimental analysis. Cities, 153, 105267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105267
Zhang, F., Wang, X. H., Nunes, P. A. L. D., & Ma, C. (2014). The recreational value of Gold Coast beaches, Australia: An application of the travel cost method. Ecosystem Services, 11, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate, Maria Alejandra Ruano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 218
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 145
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 4% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 4%.
Last 2 years: 218 views, 145 downloads.
0.67 downloads per view (journal average 1.66).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
