Input-Output Deepening and Education in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth
Keywords:
economic growth, interindustry linkages, education, industrial take-off, technological diversificationAbstract
This paper shows that a multisector model of economic growth where interindustry linkages are differentiated across sectors and technological diversification is characterized by a growing use of intermediate inputs, may be useful to analyze the process of development and industrial take-off. Education is assumed to be the driving force of technological diversification. The model yields that government subsidy to education is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for industrial take-off to occur. After aggregation, the optimal solution for the steady-state dynamic path yields that factor rewards increase with the quality of education. Local stability analysis yields that some minimum quality of education is required for long-run economic growth.Downloads
References
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Amsden, A. (1989). Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1993). Two-sector models of endogenous growth (with special attention to the role of human capital) [Ponencia]. European Summer Symposium in Macroeconomics, Roda de Barà, Tarragona, España.
Bartelsman, E. J., Caballero, R. J., & Lyons, R. K. (1991). Short and long run externalities (NBER Working Paper N.º 3810). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chenery, H. B., Robinson, S., & Syrquin, M. (1986). Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. World Bank.
Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
Leontief, W. (1986). The structure of development. In Input-output economics (2.ª ed., cap. 8). Oxford University Press. (Obra original publicada en 1963)
Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82(4), 942–963.
Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Mulligan, C. B., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Transitional dynamics in two-sector models of endogenous growth (NBER Working Paper N.º 3986). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ortiz, C. H. (1993). Industry structure and economic growth: Essays on the impact of the production structure and openness on development [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Ortiz, C. H. (1995). La transformación de funciones de producción bruta en funciones de producción neta. Boletín Socioeconómico, (29). CIDSE, Universidad del Valle.
Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Samuelson, P. A. (1966). The fundamental singularity theorem for non-joint production. International Economic Review, 7(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Carlos H. Ortiz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 112
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 9
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 35 views, 9 downloads.
0.08 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics