An Endogenous Growth Model of Social Security and the Size of the Informal Sector

Authors

  • Giancarlo Corsetti Terza Università degli Studi di Roma

Keywords:

endogenous growth, informal sector, fully-funded pensions, pay-as-you-go, overlapping generations, labor allocation

Abstract

Fully-funded pension systems are claimed to be less distortionary of labor allocation decisions than pay-as-you-go systems. This paper explores this issue in the framework of an overlapping generation model of endogenous growth where capital has an external effect on labor productivity and workers move from a formal to an informal sector in response to social security reforms. The two main features of the model are the following. First, as the social return on capital is sufficiently bounded away from zero, the economy can never be dynamically inefficient due to overaccumulation, but the private rate of return on capital may well be lower than the rate of growth. Labor market distortions determining the size of the informal sector are not necessarily lower in a fully funded system. Second, to the extent that a pension reform increases the share of output produced in the formal sector, both productivity and the rate of return on capital rise. Because of conflicting income and substitution effects, the change in consumption and growth cannot be determined unambiguously. Nonetheless, simple numerical exercises show the potential importance of the effects under consideration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrau, P., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (1993). Macroeconomic and intergenerational welfare effects of a transition from pay-as-you-go to fully-funded pension systems [Mimeo].

Blanchard, O. (1985). Debt, deficits and finite horizons. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/261297

Buiter, W. (1988). Death, birth, productivity growth and debt neutrality. Economic Journal, 98(391), 279–288.

Buiter, W. (1992). Saving and endogenous growth: A survey of theory and policy. In A. Heertje (Ed.), World savings: Theory and policy (pp. 64–99). Blackwell.

Corsetti, G., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (1994). Pension reform and growth [Mimeo]. World Bank.

Diamond, P. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126–1150.

Easterly, W. (1993). How much do distortions affect growth? Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(2), 187–212.

Jones, L., & Manuelli, R. (1992). Finite lifetimes and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90052-j

Loayza, N. (1993). Labor regulations and the informal economy [Mimeo]. Harvard University.

Rey, G. M. (1993). Il frutto proibito dell'economia italiana [Mimeo].

Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

Saint-Paul, G. (1992). Fiscal policy in an endogenous growth model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118387

Sheshinski, E. (1967). Optimal accumulation with learning by doing. In K. Shell (Ed.), Essays on the theory of optimal economic growth. MIT Press.

Tokman, V. (Ed.). (1990). Beyond regulation: The informal sector in Latin America. PREALC y Lynne Rienner.

Turnham, D. (1993). Employment and development: A new review of evidence (Development Centre Studies). OECD.

Weil, P. (1989). Overlapping families of infinitely-lived agents. Journal of Public Economics, 38(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(89)90024-8

Downloads

Published

1994-04-30

How to Cite

Corsetti, G. (1994). An Endogenous Growth Model of Social Security and the Size of the Informal Sector. Economic Analysis Review, 9(1), 57–76. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/185

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
344
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
247

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 77 views, 82 downloads.

0.72 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics