Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Fluctuations

Authors

  • Richard Rogerson Department of Economics, University of Minnesota image/svg+xml

Keywords:

sectoral shifts, real business cycles, labor mobility, cyclical fluctuations, sectoral reallocation, structural change

Abstract

This paper studies a two sector real business cycle model in which the sectors experience different trend rates of growth and labor mobility is costly. Predictions are derived concerning the correlation between sectoral reallocation of workers and the cycle. This correlation may be positive or negative depending upon whether the growing sector displays larger or smaller fluctuations than the shrinking sector. The post-World War II period has witnessed two major patterns of sectoral change in industrialized countries: movement out of agriculture and movement out of the industrial sector. The model's basic prediction is shown to be consistent with the observed pattern of reallocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davis, S. (1987). Sectoral shocks and the reallocation timing hypothesis [Mimeo].

Lebergott, S. (1964). Manpower in economic growth: The American record since 1800 (Economics Handbook Series). McGraw-Hill.

Lilien, D. (1982). Sectoral shifts and cyclical unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 90(4), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1086/261088

Romer, C. (1986). Spurious volatility in historical unemployment data. Journal of Political Economy, 94(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/261361

Downloads

Published

1991-10-31

How to Cite

Rogerson, R. (1991). Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Fluctuations. Economic Analysis Review, 6(2), 37–46. Retrieved from https://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/241

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
154
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
200

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 70 views, 112 downloads.

1.30 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics