Adjustment and Projection of Input-Output Tables under Structural Coherence through Mathematical Optimization
Keywords:
input-output tables, mathematical programming, technical coefficients, projection methods, SpainAbstract
This paper develops an adjustment and projection method for input-output tables based on mathematical programming techniques. One of its main advantages is the flexibility and ability to include information relative to the elements of the table. The information considered in the adjustment technique stems from the hypothesis that there is a stable evolution of the productive structure of the economy. This leads to the inclusion of variability margins for the technical coefficients. In order to test the accuracy of this method, the paper undertakes a projection of input-output tables for Spain in the 1995-1998 period.Downloads
References
Antonelli, C. (1999).: The economics of localised technological change and industrial dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aroche-Reyes, F. (1996). Important coefficients and structural change: A multi-layer approach. Economic Systems Research, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319600000017
Azid, T. (2002). Layers of techniques, marginal input-Output coefficients and Phillips curve: A case of US chemical industry. XIV International Conference on Input-Output Techniques. Montreal.
Cañada Martinez, A. (1994). Las tablas input-Output como sistema de información de la actividad industrial: Una caracterización general. Economía Industrial 299, septiembre-octubre, 15–33.
Cañada Martinez, A. (1995). Las tablas input-Output del INE: Aspectos metodológicos y repercusiones en el análisis económico. ICE, Nº 737, enero.
De Mesnard, L. (1995). A note on qualitative input–output analysis. Economic Systems Research, 7(4), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319500000006
Dosi, G. (2000). Innovation. Organization and Economic Dynamics, Selected Essays, Elgar. Edward, Chelteman. Londres.
Fontela, E., & Pulido, A. (1991). Input-Output, technical change, and long waves. En: W. Peterson (Ed.). Advances in Input-Output Analysis. Oxford University Press, 137–148.
Green, W. H. (1999). Analisis econométrico. 3ª edición. Prentice Hall.
Harrigan, F. J. (1983). A quadratic programming approach to data reconciliation: Contrast with RAS. En: A. Grassini y M. Smyshlyaev (eds.). Input-Output Modeling. Proceedings of the 3th IIASA Task Force Meeting, IIASA, Luxemburgo, 547–554.
Maas, C. (1994). Bounds for unknown elements of input–output matrices. Economic Systems Research, 6(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319400000005
Martinez Aguado, T., Vazquez Muñiz, A. M., Tarancon Moran, M. A., Calderon Milan, M. J., & Vera Grijalba, J. (1998). D9: Evaluación de los impactos de la actividad del transporte sobre las economías: Fundamentación científica. Proyecto ECONOMETRIST, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo.
Matuszewski, T. I., Pitts, P. R., & Sawyer, J. A. (1964). Linear programming estimates of changes in input coefficients. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 30(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/139556
Okuyama, Y., Hewings, G., Sonis, M., & Israilevich, P. (2000). An econometric analysis of biproportional properties in an econometric input-Output modeling system. R.E.A.L. Project. Workpaper 98-T-12. Universidad de Illinois y Banco de la Reserva Federal de Chicago, 13–15.
Pulido, A. (1986). Crecimiento económico y esfuerzo tecnológico. Un enfoque integrado, modelo econométrico-Modelo input-Output con coeficientes variables. Instituto L. R. Klein. Documento 86/1. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Pulido, A., & Fontela, E. (1993). Análisis input-Output: Modelos. Datos y Aplicaciones. Pirámide. Madrid.
Rodriguez Alcaide, J., Lopez Cerezuela, M., Martinez Aguado, T., & Vazquez Muñiz, A. (1988). ‘Evaluación del impacto de las obras civiles de carácter público a realizar con motivo de la exposición universal sevilla-92’. XIV Reunión de Estudios Regionales de la AECR, Torremolinos.
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A., & Cañada-Vicinay, J. (2000). Structural change in Spain 19801994. An approach to the effect of spain’s adhesion to the EU in 1986. XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques. Maccerata.
Scherer, F. M. (1982). Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64, septiembre, 627–634.
Schintke, J., & Stäglin, R. (1988). Important input coefficients in market transactions Tables and production flow Tables. En: M. Ciaschini (ed.). Input-Output Analysis. Current Developments, Chapman and Hall. Londres, Nueva York, 45–60.
Schnabl, H. (1994). The evolution of production structures, analyzed by a multi-layer procedure. Economic Systems Research, 6(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319400000004
Szyrmer, J. M. (1985). Measuring connectedness of input-Output models: 1. Survey of the measures. Environment and Planning A, 17, 1591–1612.
Tarancon Moran, M. A. (2002). Metodología de ajuste y coherencia de tablas input-Output. Aplicación a la evaluación del impacto económico de la inversión en infraestructuras del transporte. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha publicada en Pro-Quest Information and Learning, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vaccara, B. (1970). Changes over time in input-Output coefficients for the United States. En: A.P. Carter y A. Brody (eds.). Applications of Input-Output Analysis. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, North Holland, 238–260.
Vazquez Muñiz, A., & Tarancon Moran, M. A. (1999). ANAIS: Una metodología para la estimación y ajuste de tablas input-Output. Documento de Trabajo. Marzo-99. Seminario de Economía Cuantitativa. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Miguel Angel Tarancón Morán
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 191
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 264
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 51 views, 104 downloads.
1.38 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
