Opportunities to upgrade the scientific disciplines space

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702022000200049

Keywords:

Revealed comparative advantage, revealed proximity, scientific production

Abstract

Research resources in a given scientific domain may spill over into other close scientific disciplines, thereby improving performance. Using bibliometric data from the SCImago database drawn from a sample of 174 countries, we implement a measure of proximity-based on revealed comparative advantage (RCA) as a specialization or activity index. Our estimates show that proximity between disciplines positively and significantly related to the publication growth rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. D. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 673–702.

Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33, 99–123.

Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020). Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review, 110(4), 1104–1144.

Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776726

Cai, J., Zhao, H., & Coyte, P. C. (2018). The effect of intellectual property rights protection on the international competitiveness of the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in China. Engineering Economics, 29(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.1.16878

Chuang, Y. W., Lee, L. C., Hung, W. C., & Lin, P. H. (2010). Forging into the innovation lead: A comparative analysis of scientific capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919610002763

Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1974). Social stratification in science. American Journal of Physics, 42(10), 923–924. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1987897

Crespi, G. A., & Geuna, A. (2008). An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981–2002. Research Policy, 37(4), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.007

Dieter, M., & Englert, H. (2007). Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector: An empirical study with special emphasis on Germany. European Journal of Forest Research, 126(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0159-x

Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.384

Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(3), 143–148.

Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and productivity: The unfinished business. Estudios de Economía, 25(2), 145–160.

Guerini, M., & Tenca, F. (2018). The geography of technology-intensive start-ups and venture capital: European evidence. Economia e Politica Industriale, 45(3), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0098-9

Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00085-2

Harzing, A. W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1057–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0777-7

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557221

Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581

Irwin, D. A., & Klenow, P. J. (1996). High-tech R&D subsidies: Estimating the effects of Sematech. Journal of International Economics, 40(3–4), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01408-x

Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review,, 957–970.

Jambor, A., & Babu, S. C. (2017). Competitiveness of global agriculture: Policy lessons for food security: Synopsis [Informe]. International Food Policy Research Institute.

Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2000.319960

Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review,, 114–132.

Mansfield, E. (1972). Contribution of R&D to economic growth in the United States. Science, 175(4021), 477–486.

Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics,, 55–65.

Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

Payne, A. A., & Siow, A. (1999). Does federal research funding increase university research output? [Informe]. Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois.

Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9

Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6

Ruiz Gómez, L. M., Rodríguez Fernández, L., & Navío-Marco, J. (2018). Application of communication technologies (ICT) within the tourism industry in the European Union. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 66(2), 239–245.

Soete, L., & Wyatt, S. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics, 5(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02097176

Sorenson, O., & Fleming, L. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy, 33(10), 1615–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.008

Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.

Thomson, R., & Athukorala, P. C. (2020). Global production networks and the evolution of industrial capabilities: Does production sharing warp the product space? Oxford Economic Papers, 72(3), 731–747.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-07

How to Cite

Gandelman, N., Parcero, O. J., & Roldán, F. (2022). Opportunities to upgrade the scientific disciplines space. Economic Analysis Review, 37(2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702022000200049

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
80
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
219

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 68 views, 169 downloads.

2.74 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics