¿Estima y Predice el BIC Mejor que el AIC?

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000100003

Palabras clave:

AIC, BIC, criterios de información, modelos de series de tiempo, sobreajuste, evaluación de proyecciones, prueba de hipótesis conjunta

Resumen

Contestamos dos preguntas: (i) ¿Es el criterio de información bayesiano (BIC) más parsimonioso que el criterio de información de Akaike (AIC)? y (ii) ¿Es el BIC mejor que el AIC para fines predictivos? Mediante el uso de datos simulados, proporcionamos inferencia estadística con respecto a ambas hipótesis de manera individual y luego conjunta con un procedimiento de pruebas de hipótesis múltiples para controlar mejor el error tipo I. Ambas pruebas entregan el mismo resultado: el BIC muestra una superioridad dentro y fuera de la muestra sobre el AIC sólo en un contexto de muestra larga.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1974.1100705

Bhansali, R. J., & Downham, D. Y. (1977). Some properties of the order of an autoregressive model selected by a generalization of Akaike's EPF criterion. Biometrika, 64(3), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/64.3.547

Bickel, P., & Zhang, P. (1992). Variable selection in nonparametric regression with categorical covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(417), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290456

Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294361

Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998). Model selection and inference: A practical information theoretic approach. Springer.

Canova, F. (2007). Methods for applied macroeconomic research. Princeton University Press.

Chen, L., Giannakouros, P., & Yang, Y. (2007). Model combining in factorial data analysis. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137(9), 2920–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2006.10.005

Clark, T. E. (2004). Can out-of-sample forecast comparisons help to prevent overfitting? Journal of Forecasting, 23(2), 115–139.

Clark, T. E., & McCracken, M. (2001). Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models. Journal of Econometrics, 105(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00071-9

Corradi, V., & Distaso, W. (2011). Multiple forecast model evaluation. In M. P. Clements & D. F. Hendry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic forecasting (pp. 391–414). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398649.013.0014

Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263.

Fischer, S. (1981). Relative shocks, relative price volatility, and inflation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 381–431.

Geweke, J., & Meese, R. (1981). Estimating regression models of finite but unknown order. International Economic Review, 22(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526135

Gordon, R. J., & King, S. R. (1982). The output cost of disinflation in traditional and vector autoregressive models. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 13(1), 205–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534320

Granger, C. W. J., & Jeon, Y. (2004). Forecasting performance of information criteria with many macro series. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(10), 1227–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000285495

Hansen, P. R. (2005). A test of superior predictive ability. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23, 365–380.

Hansen, P. R. (2009). In-sample fit and out-of-sample fit: Their joint distribution and its implications for model selection [Unpublished manuscript]. Stanford University.

Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.

Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1993). A corrected Akaike information criterion for vector autoregressive model selection. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 14(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1993.tb00144.x

Karagrigoriou, A., Mattheou, K., & Vonta, I. (2011). On asymptotic properties of AIC variants with applications. American Open Journal of Statistics, 1(02), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2011.12012

Kilian, L. (2001). Impulse response analysis in vector autoregressions with unknown lag order. Journal of Forecasting, 20(3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-131x(200104)20:3<161::aid-for770>3.0.co;2-x

Koehler, A. B., & Murphree, E. S. (1988). A comparison of the Akaike and Schwarz criteria for selecting model order. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 37(2), 187–195.

Kuha, J. (2004). AIC and BIC: Comparison of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 188–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103262065

Lütkepohl, H. (1985). Comparison of criteria for estimating the order of a vector autoregressive process. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1985.tb00396.x

Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2004). An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 34(6), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-004-5587-0

Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610

Nickelsburg, G. (1985). Small-sample properties of dimensionality statistics for fitting VAR models to aggregate economic data: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Econometrics, 28(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90118-6

Nishii, R. (1984). Asymptotic properties of criteria for selection of variables in multiple regression. Annals of Statistics, 12(2), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346522

Pincheira, P. (2011a). A joint test of superior predictive ability for Chilean inflation (Working Paper 620) [In Spanish]. Central Bank of Chile.

Pincheira, P. (2011b). A bunch of models, a bunch of nulls and inference about predictive ability (Working Paper 607). Central Bank of Chile.

Pincheira, P. (2012). Un test conjunto de superioridad predictiva para los pronósticos de inflación chilena [A joint test of superior predictive ability for Chilean inflation forecasts]. The Chilean Economy, 15(3), 4–39.

Pötscher, B. M., & Srinivasan, S. (1991). A comparison of order estimation procedures for ARMA models. Statistica Sinica, 4, 29–50.

Raffalovich, L. E., Deane, G. D., Armstrong, D., & Tsao, H.-S. (2008). Model selection procedures in social research: Monte-Carlo simulation results. Journal of Applied Statistics, 35(10), 1094–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070802203959

Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14(5), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5

Sargent, T., & Sims, C. (1977). Business cycle modeling without pretending to have too much a priori economic theory (Working Paper 55). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

Sawa, T. (1978). Information criteria for discriminating among alternative regression models. Econometrica, 46(6), 1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913828

Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

Shibata, R. (1976). Selection of the order of an autoregressive model by Akaike information criterion. Biometrika, 63(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335091

Shibata, R. (1980). Asymptotically efficient selection of the order of the model for estimating parameters of a linear process. Annals of Statistics, 8(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344897

Shibata, R. (1981). An optimal selection of regression variables. Biometrika, 68(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.1.45

Shittu, O. I., & Asemota, M. J. (2009). Comparison of criteria for estimating the order of autoregressive process: A Monte Carlo approach. European Journal of Scientific Research, 30(3), 409–416.

Sims, C. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017

Stone, M. (1979). Comments on model selection criteria of Akaike and Schwarz. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 276–278.

Sullivan, R., Timmermann, A., & White, H. (1999). Data-snooping, technical trading rule performance, and the bootstrap. Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1647–1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00163

Wasserman, L. (2000). Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1278

Weakliem, L. D. (2004). Introduction to the special issue on model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268642

West, K. (1996). Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. Econometrica, 64(5), 1067–1084.

White, H. (2000). A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica, 68(5), 1097–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00152

Wolak, F. A. (1987). An exact test for multiple inequality and equality constraints in the linear regression model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(399), 782–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478499

Wolak, F. A. (1989). Testing inequality constraints in linear econometric models. Journal of Econometrics, 31(2), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(89)90094-8

Xu, C. J., & McLeod, I. (2012). Further asymptotic properties of the generalized information criteria. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 656–663.

Yang, Y. (2003). Regression with multiple candidate models: Selecting or mixing? Statistica Sinica, 13, 783–809.

Yi, G., & Judge, G. (1988). Statistical model selection criteria. Economics Letters, 28(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(88)90070-5

Zucchini, W. (2000). An introduction to model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1276

Publicado

2013-04-23

Cómo citar

Medel, C. A., & Salgado, S. C. (2013). ¿Estima y Predice el BIC Mejor que el AIC?. Revista De Análisis Económico, 28(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702013000100003

Número

Sección

Artículos

Uso del artículo

VistasVeces que se abrió la página de este artículo desde que la revista registra estadísticas. Una persona puede entrar más de una vez.
389
DescargasVeces que se abrió o descargó el texto completo de este artículo (normalmente el PDF).
641

Total histórico registrado por la revista.

Entre el 5 % con más vistas · últimos 2 añosComparado con todos los artículos de la revista según sus vistas en los últimos 2 años, este está entre el 5 % con más vistas.

Últimos 2 años: 201 vistas, 257 descargas.

CitasVeces que otros trabajos académicos citaron este artículo, según OpenAlex y Crossref. Los dos índices cubren fuentes distintas, por eso sus cifras difieren. : OpenAlex 21 · Crossref 11

Principales países de origen del tráfico:Países desde los que se consultó este artículo, según la conexión a internet. No son necesariamente personas. Indonesia 13 % · Polonia 13 % · Estados Unidos 13 %

1,65 descargas por vista (media de la revista: 1,65).Descargas del texto completo por cada vista del resumen de este artículo, comparado con el conjunto de la revista.

Explorar las métricas de la revista