Performance and efficiency measures in the public sector. The case of Bolivia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702018000100121Keywords:
Fiscal performance, efficiency, decentralization, public spendingAbstract
The aim of this paper is to conceptually present measures of performance, cost and efficiency of the public sector and quantify them for various services in the Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. As in all applied research, the work has limitations that originate, fundamentally, in the lack of information. But using the available information some results are obtained that can be challenged in future research. The quantifications show important improvements between 1992 and 2012. In this period, the vertical structure of the general government of Bolivia underwent a profound transformation originated in the process of fiscal decentralization. Expenditure from subnational government levels (departments and municipalities) doubled its share in total spending between 1990 and 2012 and municipal participation went from approximately one third of subnational spending to approximately two thirds. The preliminary conclusion of this work is the existence of a positive relationship between performance in the health, education, and housing and urban services sectors and decentralization. With the improvement in performance also increased the political participation of citizens so that it can be concluded, preliminarily, that the country moved in one of the positive intervals of the federalism frontier of Inman and Rubinstein.
Downloads
References
Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2003). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison (ECB Working Paper N.º 242). European Central Bank. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp242.pdf
Ahmad, E., & Brosio, G. (Eds.). (2009). Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849801850.00006
Bradford, D. F., Malt, H. A., & Oates, W. E. (1969). The rising cost of local public services: Some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal, 22(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1086/ntj41792204
Burki, S., Perry, G., & Dillinger, W. (1999). Más allá del centro: La descentralización del Estado [Beyond the center: Decentralizing the state]. Banco Mundial. http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/1999/07/5341845/beyond-center-decentralizing-state-mas-alla-del-centro-la-descentralizacion-del-estado
Caplan, D. (1998). Measuring the output of non-market services. Economic Trends, 539, 45–49.
De la Cruz, R., Pineda, C., & Pöschl, C. (Eds.). (2010). La alternativa local: Descentralización y desarrollo económico [The local alternative: Decentralization and economic development]. BID. https://issuu.com/idb_publications/docs/book_es_11998
Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 867–893. http://are.berkeley.edu/courses/ARE251/2004/papers/Faguet.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00185-8
Gupta, S., Honjo, K., & Verhoeven, M. (1997). The efficiency of government expenditures: Experiences in Africa (IMF Working Paper N.º 97/153). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp97153.pdf
Inchauste, G. (2009). Decentralization in Bolivia: Has it made a difference? In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds.), Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? (pp. 161–191). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849801850.00014
La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). The quality of government (NBER Working Paper N.º 6727). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w6727.pdf
Loayza, M. (1998). Gasto público social en la década del 90 [Social public spending in the 1990s]. UDAPE. http://www.udape.gob.bo/portales_html/analisiseconomico/analisis/vol17/ART03.pdf
Oates, W. W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
OCDE. (2015). Government at a glance. OCDE. https://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance
Paz Arauco, V., Molina, G., Jiménez Pozo, W., & Yáñez Aguilar, E. (2013). Explaining low redistributive impact in Bolivia (Commitment to Equity Working Paper N.º 6). Commitment to Equity. http://www.commitmentoequity.org/publications_files/CEQWPNo6%20LowRedistImpactBolivia%20Jan%202013.pdf
Pigou, A. C. (1947). A study in public finance (3.ª ed.). Macmillan.
Ruiz-Mier, F., & Giussani, B. (1997). El proceso de descentralización y el financiamiento de la salud y la educación en Bolivia [The decentralization process and the financing of health and education in Bolivia] (Serie Reformas de Política N.º 48). CEPAL. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/7380
Sánchez de Lozada, G., & Faguet, J. P. (2014). Why I decentralized Bolivia. Department of International Development, The London School of Economics and Political Science. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60632/. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737506.003.0002
Seemann, M. (2004). The Bolivian decentralization process and the role of municipal associations (Discussion Paper N.º 271). Hamburg Institute of International Economics. http://ssrn.com/abstract=540183
Tanzi, V. (1999). The quality of the public sector [Ponencia]. IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/1999/reforms/tanzi.htm
Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (1997). Reconsidering the fiscal role of government: The international perspective. American Economic Review, 87(2), 164–168.
Zuazo, M., Faguet, J. P., & Bonifaz, G. (Eds.). (2012). Descentralización y democracia en Bolivia [Decentralization and democracy in Bolivia]. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45840/1/Binder1.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Alberto Porto, Marcelo Garriga, Walter Garrido
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 125
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 320
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 72 views, 176 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 6 · Crossref 2
2.56 downloads per view (journal average 1.66).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
