Asymmetries in utility functions and marriage decisions: a ramsey-koopmans approach

Authors

  • Gonzalo Edwards Institute of Economics of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702018000200091

Keywords:

Ramsey model, rate of time preference, marriage decision, value of impatience, value of risk aversion

Abstract

This paper determines an empirical indicator for the cost of marrying a spouse with a different level of impatience or rate of time preference, and/or a different degree of aversion to intertemporal variability in consumption. Empirical data from different published sources are used to calibrate the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2.ª ed.). The MIT Press.

Beckerman, W., & Hepburn, C. (2007). Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics, 8(1), 187–210.

Browning, M., Chiappori, P., & Lewbel, A. (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale, adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. Review of Economic Studies, 80(4), 1267–1303. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt019

Cowell, F. A., & Gardiner, K. (1999). Welfare weights. STICERD, London School of Economics.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448

European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy. (2008). Guide to cost benefit analysis of investment projects. European Commission.

Florio, M., & Sirtori, E. (2013). The social cost of capital: Recent estimates for the EU countries (Working Paper N.º 03/2013). Centre for Industrial Studies.

Gourinchas, P.-O., & Parker, J. A. (2002). Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica, 70(1), 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00269

Haider, S., & Solon, G. (2006). Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1308–1320. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806779468508

Hall, R. E. (1988). Intertemporal substitution in consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/261539

Pearce, D. W. (2003). The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.3.362

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817434

United States Census Bureau. (2016). Historical marital status tables. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/families/marital.html

United States Federal Reserve Board. (2013). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. United States Federal Reserve Board.

United States Social Security Administration. (2014). Actuarial life tables. United States Social Security Administration. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

Zhuang, J., Zhihong, L., Lin, T., & De Guzmán, F. (2007). Theory and practice in the choice of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis: A survey (ERD Working Paper N.º 94). Asian Development Bank.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27

How to Cite

Edwards, G. (2018). Asymmetries in utility functions and marriage decisions: a ramsey-koopmans approach. Economic Analysis Review, 33(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702018000200091

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
116
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
213

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Last 2 years: 75 views, 119 downloads.

1.84 downloads per view (journal average 1.65).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics