Cyclicality of fiscal policy in Ecuador

Authors

  • Segundo Camino-Mogro ESAI Business School – Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo; Superintendencia de Compañías, Valores y Seguros del Ecuador y Ecuadorian Political Economy Lab (EPEL) image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-5237
  • Luis Brito-Gaona Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales de la Universidad Técnica de Machala y Grupo de investigación Global Plus image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702021000100049

Keywords:

Fiscal Policy, Cyclicity, Ecuador

Abstract

This article finds new empirical evidence on the cyclicality of fiscal policy in Ecuador between 1982-2018, additionally, the analysis is divided into before and after dollarization. The Ordinary Least Squares and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares methods were used and the cyclicality coefficients were estimated for a set of fiscal variables such as: real growth rate of government spending, government consumption, government capital spending, non-revenue oil and primary balance. The results show that fiscal policy is pro-cyclical but proportionally less than GDP fluctuations only in the real growth rate of government consumption, while in the other variables no robust evidence was found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Segundo Camino-Mogro, ESAI Business School – Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo; Superintendencia de Compañías, Valores y Seguros del Ecuador y Ecuadorian Political Economy Lab (EPEL)

Director Nacional de Investigación y Estudios de la Superintendencia de Compañías, Valores y Seguros del Ecuador e Investigador Asociado de ESAI Business School – Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Ecuador. E-mail: [email protected]

Luis Brito-Gaona, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales de la Universidad Técnica de Machala y Grupo de investigación Global Plus

Ph.D en Análisis Económico y Estrategia Empresarial por la Universidad de la Coruña, España. Profesor de la Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales de la Universidad Técnica de Machala, Campus El Cambio. 070150, El Oro. Ecuador. Grupo de investigación Global Plus. E-mail: [email protected]

References

Akitoby, B., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Inchauste, G. (2006). Public spending, voracity, and Wagner's law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.001

Alarco, G. (2017). Ciclos distributivos y crecimiento económico en América Latina, 1950–2014 [Distributive cycles and economic growth in Latin America, 1950–2014]. Cuadernos de Economía, 36(72), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v36n72.65819

Aldunate, E., & Martner, R. (2006). Política fiscal y protección social [Fiscal policy and social protection]. Revista de la CEPAL, 90(90), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.18356/607aada9-es

Alesina, A., Campante, F., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006–1036.

Álvarez, S. (2006). Análisis de la sostenibilidad de la política fiscal y el efecto del gasto público sobre la economía, 1994-2006 [Analysis of fiscal policy sustainability and the effect of public spending on the economy, 1994-2006]. Cuestiones Económicas, 22(3), 57–89.

Balassone, F., & Kumar, M. (2007). Cyclicality of fiscal policy. In M. Kumar & T. Ter-Minassian (Eds.), Promoting fiscal discipline (pp. 19–35). International Monetary Fund.

Barro, R. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 940–971. https://doi.org/10.1086/260807

Barro, R. (1999). Inequality, growth, and investment (NBER Working Paper N.º 7038). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bird, R. (2006). Tax incentives for foreign investment in Latin America and the Caribbean: Do they need to be harmonized? (ITP Paper N.º 0601). University of Toronto.

Blanchard, O., Amighini, A., & Giavazzi, F. (2012). Macroeconomía [Macroeconomics]. Pearson Educación.

Blanchard, O., Dell'Ariccia, G., & Mauro, P. (2010). Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589069770.072.ch002

Brito-Gaona, L., & Iglesias, E. (2017). Inversión privada, gasto público y presión tributaria en América Latina [Private investment, public spending and tax pressure in Latin America]. Estudios de Economía, 44(2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52862017000200131

Brito-Gaona, L., & Iglesias, E. (2018). Inversión privada, gasto público e impuestos en la Unión Europea [Private investment, public spending and taxes in the European Union]. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 26(2), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2516

Brito-Gaona, L., Sotomayor-Pereira, G., & Apolo-Vivanco, J. (2019). Análisis y perspectivas del valor agregado bruto en la economía ecuatoriana [Analysis and perspectives of gross value added in the Ecuadorian economy]. X-pedientes Económicos, 3(5), 17–36.

Caballero-Urdiales, E., & López-Gallardo, J. (2012). Gasto público, impuesto sobre la renta e inversión privada en México [Public spending, income tax and private investment in Mexico]. Investigación Económica, 71(280), 55–84.

Camino-Mogro, S., Andrade-Díaz, V., & Villacís-Pesántez, D. (2016). Posicionamiento y eficiencia del banano, cacao y flores del Ecuador en el mercado mundial [Positioning and efficiency of bananas, cocoa and flowers in the global market]. Ciencia UNEMI, 9(19), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol9iss19.2016pp48-53p

Camino-Mogro, S., & Armijos-Bravo, G. (2018). Assessing competition in the private banking sector in Ecuador: An econometric approach with the Panzar-Rosse model. Cuadernos de Economía, 41(117), 225–240.

Camino-Mogro, S., Bermúdez-Barrezueta, N., & Avilés, P. (2018). Análisis sectorial: Panorama de la inversión empresarial en el Ecuador 2013-2017 [Sectoral analysis: Overview of business investment in Ecuador 2013-2017]. X-pedientes Económicos, 2(2), 79–102.

Carrillo-Maldonado, P. (2015). Efectos macroeconómicos de la política fiscal en Ecuador 1993-2009 [Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy in Ecuador 1993-2009]. Analítika: Revista de Análisis Estadístico, (9), 21–52.

Castillo, J. (2007). Una nota acerca de los subsidios, la política y la economía [A note on subsidies, politics and the economy]. Cuestiones Económicas, 23(3), 171–181.

CEPAL. (2007). La política fiscal en tiempos de bonanza [Fiscal policy in times of boom]. ILPES.

Céspedes, L., & Velasco, A. (2014). Was this time different? Fiscal policy in commodity republics. Journal of Development Economics, 106(26), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.07.012

Cottarelli, C., Gerson, P., & Senhadji, A. (Eds.). (2014). Post-crisis fiscal policy. MIT Press.

Erbil, M. N. (2011). Is fiscal policy procyclical in developing oil-producing countries? (IMF Working Paper N.º 11-171). International Monetary Fund.

Fernández, A., Parejo, J., & Rodríguez, L. (1995). Política económica [Economic policy]. McGraw-Hill.

Frankel, J. A., Vegh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2013). On graduation from fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.001

Furman, J. (2016). The new view of fiscal policy and its application. VoxEU, Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://voxeu.org/article/new-view-fiscal-policy-and-its-application

Gachet, I., Maldonado, D., Ramírez, J., & Oliva, N. (2011). Hechos estilizados de la economía ecuatoriana: El ciclo económico 1965-2008 [Stylized facts of the Ecuadorian economy: The business cycle 1965-2008]. University Library of Munich.

Galí, J., & Perotti, R. (2003). Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe. Economic Policy, 18(37), 533–572.

Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 11–61.

Hodrick, R., & Prescott, E. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 1–16.

IMF. (2019). IMF Executive Board approves US$4.2 billion Extended Fund Facility for Ecuador. International Monetary Fund.

Izquierdo, A. (2016). A better way for government to save [Capítulo de libro] (pp. 187–215). Inter-American Development Bank.

Jiménez, J. (2015). Desigualdad, concentración del ingreso y tributación sobre las altas rentas en América Latina [Inequality, income concentration and taxation of high incomes in Latin America] (Libros de la CEPAL). CEPAL. https://doi.org/10.18356/9abfca99-es

Jiménez, J., & Ter-Minassian, T. (2016). Política fiscal y ciclo en América Latina: El rol de los gobiernos subnacionales [Fiscal policy and the cycle in Latin America: The role of subnational governments]. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.

Kaminsky, G., Reinhart, C., & Vegh, C. (2004). When it rains, it pours: Procyclical macro-policies and capital flows. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2004, 11–53.

Klemm, A. (2014). Fiscal policy in Latin America over the cycle (IMF Working Paper N.º 14-59). International Monetary Fund.

Lane, P. (2003). The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2661–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00075-0

Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 942–963.

Lledó, V., Yackovlev, I., & Gadenne, L. (2011). A tale of cyclicality, aid flows and debt: Government spending in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 20(5), 823–849.

Machinea, J. (2007). Ideas para una agenda de desarrollo [Ideas for a development agenda]. Pensamiento Iberoamericano,, 41–74.

Pacheco, D. (2006). Ecuador: Ciclo económico y política fiscal [Ecuador: Business cycle and fiscal policy]. Cuestiones Económicas, 22, 7–56.

Quah, D. (1993). Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis (CEPR Discussion Paper N.º 820). Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Ramírez, E. (2006). Por una política fiscal contracíclica [For a countercyclical fiscal policy]. Problemas del Desarrollo, 37(147), 81–108.

Ruiz-Arranz, M., & Díaz-Cassou, J. (2018). Reformas y desarrollo en el Ecuador contemporáneo [Reforms and development in contemporary Ecuador]. Inter-American Development Bank.

Schuknecht, L. (2000). Fiscal policy cycles and public expenditure in developing countries. Public Choice, 102(1–2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005026806998

Taylor, J. (2000). Reassessing discretionary fiscal policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.21

Thornton, J. (2008). Explaining procyclical fiscal policy in African countries. Journal of African Economies, 17(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejm029

Toro, J., & Lozano, I. (2007). Fiscal policy throughout the business cycle: The Colombian experience. Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 25(55), 12–39. https://doi.org/10.32468/espe.5501

Vegh, C., & Vuletin, G. (2015). How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3), 327–370. https://doi.org/10.1596/29303

Vera-Gilces, P., Camino-Mogro, S., Ordeñana-Rodríguez, X., & Cornejo-Marcos, G. (2020). A look inside banking profitability: Evidence from a dollarized emerging country. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 75, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.05.002

Villela, L., & Barreix, A. (2002). Taxation and investment promotion. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

Viscarra-Andrade, H. (2010). Efectos del gasto e inversión pública en el crecimiento económico del Ecuador [Effects of public spending and investment on Ecuador's economic growth] [Tesis de maestría]. FLACSO Sede Ecuador.

Vos, R. (2001). Liberalización, desigualdad y pobreza: América Latina y el Caribe en los 90 [Liberalization, inequality and poverty: Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s]. PNUD; CEPAL.

Published

2021-04-06

How to Cite

Camino-Mogro, S., & Brito-Gaona, L. (2021). Cyclicality of fiscal policy in Ecuador. Economic Analysis Review, 36(1), 49–84. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702021000100049

Issue

Section

Articles

Article usage

ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
115
DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
205

All time, as recorded by the journal.

Among the top 14% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 14%.

Last 2 years: 107 views, 147 downloads.

CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 12 · Crossref 9

Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. Chile 13% · United States 13% · China 9%

1.78 downloads per view (journal average 1.66).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.

Explore the journal's metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)