Fiscal Decentralization and Corruption: An Empirical Verification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702024000100059Keywords:
Fiscal decentralization, corruptionAbstract
The relationship between fiscal decentralization and the extraction of income by private agents is a constant element in the debates on territorial institutional design. Theoretical literature makes ambiguous predictions about this relationship, and it has been little studied empirically. An econometric model is estimated for a panel of data from 73 developing countries for the years 1996-2019. In general, the evidence found regarding the role of spending decentralization in a lower perception of corruption is consistent. However, a decentralization of income is related to greater corruption. In this way, possible accountability systems appear independent of the generation of own resources and transfer systems are highlighted in the control of public spending.
Downloads
References
Aidt, T. S., & Dutta, J. (2017). Fiscal federalism and electoral accountability. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 19(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12179
Akpan, E. O. (2011). Fiscal decentralization and social outcomes in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 167–183.
Altunbaş, Y., & Thornton, J. (2012). Fiscal decentralization and governance. Public Finance Review, 40(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142111424276
Arikan, G. G. (2004). Fiscal decentralization: A remedy for corruption? International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 175–195.
Bahl, R. W. (1999). Implementation rules for fiscal decentralization (Working Paper N.º 10). International Studies Program, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralisation and accountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries. The Economic Journal, 116(508), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01049.x
Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6
Dell’Anno, R., & Teobaldelli, D. (2015). Keeping both corruption and the shadow economy in check: The role of decentralization. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-013-9298-4
Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2003). Decentralization and political institutions (CEPR Discussion Paper N.º 3857). Center for Economic Policy Research.
Fan, C. S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001
Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
Fondo Monetario Internacional. (2020). Fiscal decentralization database. https://data.imf.org/?sk=1C28EBFB-62B3-4B0C-AED3-048EEEBB684F
Hindriks, J., & Lockwood, B. (2009). Decentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation and voter welfare. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.01.004
Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2011). Decentralization and corruption: New cross-country evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1081r
Kotsogiannis, C., & Schwager, R. (2008). Accountability and fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 92(12), 2336–2349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.013
Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998). Rethinking decentralization in developing countries. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4350-5
Nelson, M. A. (2012). Corruption and the size of local governments: Are they related? (Working Paper N.º 1210). International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544302.00008
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E. (1977). Federalismo fiscal [Fiscal federalism] (Colección Nuevo Urbanismo N.º 25). Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G., & Trebbi, F. (2001). Electoral rules and corruption (Working Paper N.º 416). Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute for Economic Research.
Prud’homme, R. (1995). On the dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/10.2.201
Robalino, D. A., Picazo, O. F., & Voetberg, A. (2001). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from a cross-country analysis (Policy Research Working Paper N.º 2565). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2565
Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57(4), 695–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818303574021
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Bwire, A. P. (2005). La ineficiencia económica en los procesos de descentralización [Economic inefficiency in decentralization processes]. Ekonomiaz: Revista Vasca de Economía, (58), 146–175. https://doi.org/10.69810/ekz.0740
Sharma, C. K. (2006). Decentralization dilemma: Measuring the degree and evaluating the outcome. Indian Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 49–64.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.
Tanzi, V. (1994). Corruption, governmental activities, and markets (IMF Working Paper). International Monetary Fund.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Enrique Pinilla, Patricia Hernández-Medina, Gabriel Ramírez-Torrez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 150
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 172
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Among the top 12% by views · last 2 yearsCompared with all the journal's articles by views in the last 2 years, this one is among the top 12%.
Last 2 years: 117 views, 151 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 1 · Crossref 1
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. Colombia 25% · United States 17% · Germany 11%
1.15 downloads per view (journal average 1.66).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics
